Reason Why Pacquaio vs JMM Is Considered So Controversial

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by smitty_son408, Jan 13, 2009.

Page 2 of 2
  1. smitty_son408

    smitty_son408 J ust E njoy T his S hit Full Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    6,030
    Likes Received:
    12
    WAT THE HELL ARE TALKING ABOUT... I never said a KD= A WIN. JMM got knockdown 3 times it was a 10-6 round (maybe 10-7 because most judges don't believe in taking off another point because it puts the other fighter too far out of the fight). Thats what cost him on the cards and exactly the point i was making ****boy
     
    smitty_son408, Jan 13, 2009
    #16
  2. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    6,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    The 1st fight was a close win by Pac that was nullified by a scoring error and that was the controversy. There should be no controversy in the 2nd fight, it was 6-6 by rounds but Pac got the win because of the KD in the 3rd round. It could had been a 7-5 win by JMM if the KD did not happen because he was winning the said round before the KD.
     
    kalunya5964, Jan 16, 2009
    #17
  3. ku_las

    ku_las Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2008
    Messages:
    503
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just because they are the perfect match in boxing, no matter how many times they fought, It will always go the eitheir way.
     
    ku_las, Jan 16, 2009
    #18
Page 2 of 2