Reason why prime pound per pound # 3 mab lost to 1-d pac?

All of the above.

 

I respect Barrera but Pac just owns him on any day!!

 

Pacquiao would always beat him at any weight and time because of styles.

But that wasn't prime MAB, despite his P4P ranking. He was still the best fighter in that weight class and one of the best fighters in the world, but he had been in the ring for 13 years or so by then, and altered his style much like Hopkins did to increase his longevity. MAB was in his prime from about 95 to 1999-00. That wasn't prime MAB in there with Hamed either. He was at his best at 122, not 126 or 130. Regardless Pacquiao would have beaten him WORSE in his prime due to the style Barrera employed at the time.

 

He should of beat him when he could of beat him. He didn't.

 

Well if anyone was to vote for too old or too many wars wouldn't that be an argument that Barrera was not in his prime?

 

Barrera wore the wrong socks and gloves.

 

Going through a divorce.:|

 

Of course, otherwise MAB would have beaten pacman. :yep

 

PAC speed power and relentless atteck is too much for MAB it is not wise match up for him...

 

he had a metal plate on his head , was unprepared, was not able to train due to forest fire, etc. etc. :yep

 

both were un prepared, both were fighting professionally at a very early age...PAC's style will always be a problem to MAB.