Reason why prime pound per pound # 3 mab lost to 1-d pac?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by johnco, Mar 8, 2008.


  1. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    I really hate Pacquaio nuthuggers who are coming out more and more lately due to the fact that he's overdue for a loss and people are over him essentially in what he can do, he's maxed out at 130 and isn't even the best fighter there and they can't stand it.

    What does THIS have to do with anything going on in the near future in boxing? Nothing, but the thread starter is initiating it as if it does.
     
  2. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Manny would have always given Marco big problems and probably beaten him. Juan Manuel on the other hand WILL beat Pacquiao next week.
     
  3. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    this thread is a response to threads like this...
    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=50852
     
  4. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    I can't wait either, Pac getting a massive drop in P4P rankings is long overdue, I currently can't justify moving him from #3, but I can't wait to drop his ass down to about #8 where he's belonged since he hit 130 pounds.

    Then I'm going to move JMM up to #1, if it's a definitive win, as Joy Boy is doing jack **** this year and doesn't deserve to stay at #1 just for having another sparring session/circus fight with DLH.
     
  5. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
  6. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    jmm's fights w/ barrera and juarez @130 pale in comparison to pac's resume @130. so, pac is still currently the best fighter at this weight until jmm or someone else beats him. let's see what happens in March 15.
     
  7. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    well it sure creates emotions in the forum doesnt it?
     
  8. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    yep i agree but you are asking what it had to do with boxing's near future. the answer is nothing. esb is full of **** vendetta threads. but i'm glad this question was asked.
     
  9. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    I agree with this. same goes to pacquiao if he demolishes marquez.
     
  10. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Well, Guzman is the best fighter at 130, so I don't know where you're getting at.:yep
     
  11. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    If Pac wins, then he's #1 p4p, no problem.
     
  12. hmi

    hmi Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,257
    0
    Sep 14, 2007
    Try to put water on both sides. Go to that thread (link posted by puga_ni_nana) and also ask the thread starter why he needs to make that kind of thread. You know the usual suspects among the Pac fans as well as the Mexican fans.
     
  13. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    No its not. Did you not read the first post, it has nothing to do with the thread you linked.:rofl

    Its just a known pac nuthugger trying to start **** but no ones biting.:yep

    I cant wait until the TS is praising JMM after Marquez handily defeats pacman.:deal:bbb
     
  14. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    No he's not...he hasnt fought with quality like what the top 4 (pac,mab,em,jmm) has delivered.
     
  15. johnco

    johnco Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,598
    0
    May 9, 2006
    thank you sir for respect. and so with jmm if he pulls it through :good