Archie Moore's up as well. Another really impressive one that justifies a top ten pound-for-pound placement.
**** me, this must have taken a bit of effort. Fair do's mate, I very much doubt that I'd have the requisite patience to do this for the most part. And Charles' record is SICK. Burley's actually looks a bit underwhelming in comparison to some of the others, though still remarkable in it's own right.
Not too bad actually, can be a bit time consuming but when there's a bit of spare time and I've got **** all else to do it can be quite amusing. Emile Griffith's up.
Roberto Duran would have to be a high priorty one, although dedicated fans will probably know his top wins off by heart.
and langford's still not mentioned. is there something bad with rematching physically superior opostion ? is it his fault that jack johnson and possibly many others didn't want to rematch (or even match at all) him ? ketchell was murderred before rematching him (i don't say it was an excuse to pull out). and holyfield , toney are also not to blaim for these days politics , etc. compared to our era - they are the equivalents of charles , langford , duran , etc.
He is taking them from the Boxing Register, if they are not in the IBHOF they will probably not be on the list for the moment.