Much? Not really. Floyd is certainly bigger than Marquez, but "much bigger?" Come on now. And again: implying that somebody who started at 130 is a "real welterweight" is a ludicrous argument by Lady Guy. Thomas Hearns was "real cruiserweight" with that re****ed logic.
Marquez in his 30s was still fighting at featherweight. Mayweather couldn't even make 126 when he made his debut as a teen.
I didn't say he wasn't bigger. But "much bigger?" You're exaggerating. Acting like it was some insurmountable size difference is nonsense. Other boxers have certainly had bigger size advantages. If you want to argue otherwise, have at it. Boxing history is on my side.
he was 144 1/2 versus margarito at a super welterweight bout:rofl http://giphy.com/gifs/reaction-lauging-lold-qMqjZkmMi8wFO you flo-os are killing me groupies i tell ya. you flo-os are nothing but groupies:deal
If Mayweather as a teenager was bigger than Marquez in his 30s then it's pretty safe to say that Mayweather is much bigger than Marquez. We're talking about a career featherweight here. Mayweather couldn't even make it to 25 years old before he outgrew 130 pounds.
Floyd started at 130. Yes, JMM started below Floyd in his career. Yes, Floyd is "bigger." Much bigger at the time of their bout? You're just making **** up. Sorry.
He couldn't even make 135 once he got into his late 20s. Marquez was fighting at featherweight in his 30's. He's much, much smaller.
Marquez was draining to stay at featherweight in his 30's. Check his and Pac's fight night weights when they fought at 130. Both over 140. Stop making **** up.