Laughable. I said at the time that the fight was a disgrace and Wlad should be criticized for even thinking about it. Of course, that was ignored and people talked about Chisora's desire and whatever else. Bull****. It was always a mismatch and shame on anyone who justified it.
Wlad v anyone bar Vitali is a mismatch. Where's the thread you made abut Haye's stellar defence against Harrison? Oh wait, you only seem to find your voice to criticise Wlad.
Those that were defending the Chisora fight, did so on the premise of it being a stay-busy bout. I don't actually recall anyone trying to justify him as a good opponent for Wlad. Besides, he's better than Audley.
JACK: In a previous thread titled "Is Derek Chisora the most feared boxer in the world", that was started after Wladimir cancelled the Chisora fight, you posted this: "Are Ukrainians any different to women, in terms of testicular fortitude? Who has bigger balls? Women or Ukrainian men?!" So, as LukeO says, just **** off.
Chisora was considered a legitimate challenge by the Wlad fans while Haye was a disgrace who didn`t deserve to be in the same ring as Wlad. Lets not bull**** now please people as they were the facts laid down by the Wlad fans.
What does this have to do with Haye? I always said Fury would beat Chisora, Haye would and Wlad would decimate him.
Chisora is tough & showed a lot of heart. He is light years behind both Klits technically but even though he wasnt in peak condition he put up a fight & Tyson couldnt take him out.
Not really. Haye, a glass jawed fighter, lasted 12 rounds with the best heavyweight in the world. Chisora just got schooled by an ordinary, green fighter. People actually defended Wlad hand picking Chisora. Farcical.