Most had never seem him fight and ranked him solely on his undefeated record. I've been saying for ages neither Fury or Chisora were any good.
You probably will. Just because it was a garbage fight, Wlad still pulled out twice with a bull**** injury each time. I always called the fight a farce and when Wlad pulled out, that was wrong too.
People rated him because he was mentioned in the same sentence as Wlad. He was always overhyped and struggled twice with Sexton, yet idiotic Wlad fans were happy to praise their man fighting a "young, undefeated, hungry heavyweight". Plenty of people were for this. Why? Because Wlad was fighting him. The same reason guys like Peter, Ibragimov, Chagaev etc., are hugely overrated.
If you want to look, you'll find me saying the Harrison bout was pathetic. Why do you assume I would say otherwise?
Based on Chisora actually taking a step forward every now and then and throwing more than one punch per round.
From the same genius that said that Booth's grand strategy was going to be the difference-maker for Haye, as it was unsolvable by Manny and WK.
I believe Wladimir only went after Chisora to get some media exposure in the UK and putting pressure on Haye, backing him into a corner. At the time Haye was very reluctant and had all these lame excuses.
Wlad barely looked a million dollars though did he? It was a **** fight where Wlad won by being slightly less worse than Haye.
he honestly would. i don't see why chisora is better than sprott or 90% of fraudley's opponents. even harrison could slip those wild swings. & you've seen how chisora deals with a tall fighter with a jab...badly...even if they are as **** as tyson fury.