Be astonished, then, and do more research before you open your mouth, especially when you're opening it in an attempt to refute what I'm saying or the points I am making: http://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/sport/boxing/3832401.EXCLUSIVE__US_TV_giant_backs_Millennium_Stadium_finale_for_Calzaghe/ You're dumb, real dumb. Next time, don't try to mess around with me and don't flap your gums when you don't know your sh*t, or I'll embarrass you again.
False. Your conflating visibility with PPV buys. They aren't necessarily correlated. In other words, there are people who have HBO and who presumably watched 24/7 who didn't order the fight. I know some such people. Those people didn't know Calzaghe before, but they know him now. In other words, Joe's visibility among these people has been raised, even though they didn't drop the money to watch the fight on PPV. Now, I understand the goal of the 24/7 is to build buys for the PPV. However, I used the term 'visibility' specifically to differentiate it from PPV buys. It's a safe bet to assume that there are those who watched the 24/7 who did not know Calz before and who now know him. This is not tied to the PPV numbers. As I said, the 24/7 raised Joe's American visibility. And we're not even talking about people who will end up watching the 24/7 on the 'net in the future. This is one reason it's hard for Joe to walk away now. After all of these years, he's starting to get some publicity, he can promote his own fights and he's turning big checks. That isn't easy to walk away from, especially when you're schooling guys like Jones as easily as Joe did (shut Roy out the last 11 rounds).
Easy tiger, it's very reasonable be suprised if hbo did try to get calzaghe dawson despite what the article says. Dawson is a Showtime fighter last I knew so they have to go through all kinds of **** to get a fight negotiated. If it was with a hbo fighter and joe was not worried about who he fought then they are gonna go Hbo all the way and save themselves a heap of money. I would like Joe to fight Dawson just to see ESB the day after he beat him. "Calzaghe slaps and is scared of Johnson" "is calzaghe an atg" "Dawson was a limited fighter" and so on forever and ever.
If people know who you are but don't want to see you fight then you're not that visible. Just because they KNOW him doesn't mean they're interested in seeing him fight. All 24/7 was show who he is and it was enthralling that the people who saw him decided to not pay to see him fight. 24/7 exposed Hatton to American boxing fans and they paid in bunches to see Hatton fight. It's one thing to say "Well Americans know who Calzaghe is now"...sure they might know him but they damn sure weren't paying to see him fight. Manfredo vs Calzaghe was disappointing, Calzaghe vs Kessler did terrible on WCB, Calzaghe vs Hopkins couldn't sell out in Vegas and did poor despite the hyping of it and now RJJ-Calzaghe does a measly buy rate. Can we just say he's not a draw in America?
I too think it's hard to imagine HBO hyping a Dawson-Calzaghe fight without having a Dawson fight on HBO. Dawson is the closest thing to a Showtime exclusive fighter these days.
Shut up, and don't dream of patronizing me or thinking you know more of what's going on here than I do. Save your breath, 'Tiger.' I don't suffer fools gladly, never have. Guys that mess around with me on subjects I know infinitely more about than they do get clowned. That's what you just saw. Not my fault. The guy above wanted to crap on Joe and so he made a statement he shouldn't have made around a guy like me who knows more about what's going on than he does. So, I simply pointed out the obvious. Don't fault me for that. He wanted to play games with the PPV buy numbers and I exposed his ignorance of HBO's intentions for what it was. Do you understand what a reporter's credibility means? Or here's a different question -- do you think the guy who wrote the story is making up what the HBO exec said? Do you, ESB Guy, think you understand what HBO wants to do better than the HBO exec? I've already been through all this. Get a late pass. Dawson isn't saying he'll fight Joe in Wales (as he did) unless he knows Showtime will get on board with the fight. In fact, part of why the HBO guy is likely saying this to the reporter is to help the negotiation process with Dawson and Showtime. This is how the game works. Could the deal fall through? Absolutely. That's not the issue. The issue is whether or not HBO is interested in backing such a fight. They are, and that's what the article states. Don't conflate and don't try to patronize people who understand the situation better than you do.
Froch would be ok; a decent opponent, but nothing special. Dawson would be great. Hopkins rematch would be ok. Calzaghe needs to win four fights to accomplish the 50-0.
Dude, you're burying yourself here. How bad do you want to be embarrassed? I know words and meanings -- particularly those which I write -- better than you do. I can assure you of that. 'Visibility,' as I am using it, refers to people being aware of your existence. The word literally means 'being perceivable by the eye.' You're confusing visibility, I think, with 'viability' or 'marketability.' They're not the same terms, and there's a reason why I didn't use those terms and instead used 'visibility.' Let's try this again: There are almost certainly people who watched 24/7 who did not order the fight. Thus, 24/7 may not have helped the PPV numbers but it DID increase Joe's visibility because people who had never seen him before or did not know his story now do. Do you understand that? Does that make sense to you? How many more times do we have to go over this before you understand what I'm saying? Do you understand what 'correlation' means, or 'conflation?' The 24/7 did, and will continue, to raise Joe's American VISIBILITY. THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT THOSE WHO SAW THE SHOW HAVE TO HAVE ORDERED THE PPV TO NOW KNOW WHO JOE IS WHEN THEY DIDN'T KNOW WHO HE WAS BEFORE. I hope that helps. If you can't grasp what I'm saying by now then there may be little hope for you. If anyone else can help Arriba out with the differentiation of terms I'm using, please feel free to jump in.
:rofl:rofl:rofl Wooo easy kid. So when a politician tells the press what he is going to do you believe him? Grow up son then come back and talk to the big boys. "BUT THE HBO EXEC SAID HE WILL TRY TO GET DAWSON THE SHOWTIME FIGHTER, WHY IS THIS NOT HAPPENING? THEY SEEM TO BE TRYING TO GET AN HBO FIGHTER INSTEAD. BUT LOOK AT MY ARTICLE? WHY WOULD HE LIE TO A JOURNALIST"
I dont want him to fight Hopkins again, that fight was boring, hopkins did **** all, and even now people try to discredit his win by sayin Hopkins is old, so why fight the old man again. Dawson, Froch (providing he gets past pascal) or Taylor (providing he beats Lacy) would be my picks.
Calm yourself. This doesn't anything about pay-per-view in the United States, or a 24/7 which would constitute "full backing", which is what I said. Astonishment on hold until HBO decide to do exactly what they did last time - even though it returned half the projected buys. Half.