Request for Classic opinions on current version of Pacquiao vs the best jr-welters

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by horst, Nov 16, 2009.


  1. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Yeah i was thinking about it just. The workrate is huge for Manny. I didn't really think Locche was all about controlling pace myself though. Not like a Whittaker say, or Hopkins, who dictate pace with jabs or distance. I always thought Locche just let's guys do what they want but frustrates them and makes them miss regardless.

    It's a close call i reckon.
     
  2. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    How does 'the classic forum' underestimate Pacquiao when a shitload of us here rate him as a great fighter?

    What's your game nobby?
     
  3. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    why would they pick dela hoya to beat pacquiao?

    and why most posters here think that pac-hatton fight is 50-50 when pac has all the advantage to demolish hatton.
     
  4. horst

    horst Guest

    You're being silly here. It was perfectly valid to think Oscar would beat Pac before that fight. Oscar had pushed Floyd all the way the previous year, and he was of course the bigger man, a much bigger man. Many staunch Pac fans thought that Oscar would win.
     
  5. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    Yeah, I just rewatched some Locche footage and you're spot on about the pace.He is so, so good.

    This is our suffering and our joy. You always think the last fighter you watched has an edge because they all have so much going for them. I think Manny's handspeed bothers Locche, but I'm not sure he loses.
     
  6. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    :good
     
  7. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Oscar was also fighting at a more natural weight of 154 pounds not 145. Big difference. I think pac was always considered a threat because of his speed and power, but the #1 underlying question that made him somewhat of an underdog and seemed to make his accomplishments bigger, is the fact that people questioned whether he could handle the "size" of his opponents. He had been knocked out and down by smaller guys, so there was this big question of whether or not he could take a real welterweight punch.
    Now, after three successful welterweight fights, that has to be taken out of the equation. Pac is a welterweight now. He has better than average welterweight power, and a welterweight chin with speed to boot, so hes not this little guy thats at some huge strength, size and power deficit.
     
  8. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    If being an inaccurate predictor "exposes" a poster, and you distance yourself from that category, may I ask how you have spent the millions you have undoubtedly earned with your correct fight predictions?
     
  9. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Out of Tzsyu, Chavez, Taylor, Pryor and DeLaHoya, I would only pick Chavez with any real confidence to beat him. And even there I acknowledge Pacquiao has a good chance too.
    Taylor and Pryor have a good chance against him, but I'd probably favour Pacman.
    Tzsyu and DeLaHoya, I dont give much chance.
     
  10. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I've seen people here like Sweet Pea call the Pac-Hatton fight to a tee. Plus i myself called the Cotto-Pac fight. You're off your head.
     
  11. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Why so high on him beating Pryor? With Pryor's chin, unflinching offence AND ability to keep it at mid-range if he needs (without the massive reach disparity he had against Arguello I'd doubt he'd get hit as much) I just can't see Pac living with it. There's a difference between a few shots from Cotto and numerous shots from Pryor.

    Over 12, maybe Pac. over 15, Pryor all the way IMO
     
  12. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Thank you very much for speaking up on this.
     
  13. horst

    horst Guest

    Why Pryor all the way over 15 mate, has Pacquiao ever shown you anything to suggest his workrate and stamina would wilt if he had to go another three? I haven't. I think he always looks as energetic in round 12 as he does in round 1.

    I think people too often think of Pryor as the Pryor of the first Arguello fight, but he didn't always perform like that. Have you seen the Dujuan Johnson fight? Pacquiao's power and angles would score multiple knockdowns of a Pryor in that mode, no doubt in my mind of that.
     
  14. PunchOut

    PunchOut Active Member Full Member

    1,236
    2
    Apr 26, 2009
    Vs Pryor would be a war that would win the last man standing ... this would be an epic and brutal fight ... could be either way

    Vs Tszyu .. very similar to the Pryor fight only that this ending in a KO for Pac in the later RDS .... after get a brutal beating in his way to defeat Tszyu

    vs Taylor ... i would love to see how Pac deals with someone who really is faster than him ... anyway i think Pac Power and stamina would be the edge .. Pac Ko 11 after gettin frustrated

    Vs Young Prime Hoya
    Pac get outboxed by the tallest, and almost fast Young Hoya ... 8-4 UD for Young Hoya

    Vs Chavez
    Chavez is no Cotto asero ... or hatton, or a weight drained hoya ... Chavez is the only one fighter that i think could be toe to toe with Pac and get the better part .. Chavez Legendary Chin, Legendary Stamina and the most Dangerous Body attack of all time would brutally beat the Pacman in 10 with the early rounds goes for Pac ....

    * if Pacs try to "Feel" the power of Chavez like he did against the ropes with Cotto ... he would be a Dead Man
     
  15. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    Reach wouldn't have anything to do with it. Pryor's defense was wretched against southpaws. Look at him against Kameda just before he fought Arguello, and against Hinton afterward. Pacquiao would have a field day teeing off on that. And while he didn't have the height/reach advantages that Arguello had, his punches were much quicker and sharper than Arguello at that weight and would be coming from more problematic angles.


    But there's also a difference between walking in wide open against Kameda/Hinton and against Pacquiao.