Rescoring De La Hoya-Trinidad....what is your new scorecard

I know my original card was a 2 point win for Oscar, this fight can look different secnd time around though, like Hagler-Leonard in that respect.

 

No matter what the scoring. De La Hoya did not deserve to win due to his performance in the last half of the fight. Disgraceful. He had the fight won plain & simple, then just gave it away. Trinidad came to fight twelve hard round & earned the victory. Just as simple as that.

 

Round 1: Even
Round 2: Oscar
Round 3: Oscar
Round 4: Tito
Round 5: Oscar
Round 6: Oscar
Round 7: Oscar
Round 8: Tito
Round 9: Oscar
Round 10: Tito
Round 11: Tito
Round 12: Tito

6-5-1, or 115-114 for Oscar.

 

edit

 

I always give credit to the guy who wins the fight (or who i have), that means Duran beat Leonard the first time, not Leonard LOST the fight. And same case here, no matter what occurred, at the end i had Oscar so he deserved it imo

 

Suzie , check out my luv 4 Oscar in the post above! Cherish it, u wont be seein that again! Haha (kiddin)

 

Bull****. Fights are scored on a round by round basis and as such, Oscar definitely deserved the victory and this should have been (was) his career best win. ****ing corrupt judges.


Unless you can show me a rule in the WBC regulations that says "it's okay if you're getting outboxed, as long as you work hard, you deserve to win, we'll cheat some rounds that you clearly lost on your side".

 

Trinidad wasn't "Given" Anything. He continued to fight hard all the way & was given the nod in a close fight. What I'm saying is De La Hoya had it in the bag, But not overwelming, and he just coasted the last few rounds, Making the fight very close.

 

Thats exactly the way i scored it. I guess the judges scored the last 3 rounds 10-8 becuase Oscar wasn't throwing punches and Trinidad won the rounds by simply throwing. People may critize Oscar however that was a smart move. He was gassed out and if he allowed Trinidad to hit him, then he could have been stopped. Trinidad was a big banger at 147 and he had excellent condition.

 

Round 1: Oscar 10-9

Round 2: Oscar 10-9

Round 3: Oscar 10-9

Round 4: Trinidad 10-9

Round 5: Oscar 10-9

Round 6: Oscar 10-9

Round 7: Oscar 10-9

Round 8: Oscar 10-9

Round 9: Oscar 10-9

Round 10: Trinidad 10-9

Round 11: Trinidad 10-9

Round 12: Trinidad 10-9


The fight is scored over 12 rounds, not decided on the last three because one fighter decides to back off on the backfoot. I think Trinidad never deserved the decision based on his lack of variation and poor defense over the vast majority of the contest. He couldn't land more than one punch at a time.

 

If he wasn't landing anything than why would they be 10-8 rounds? :?

 

One round which is actually close is the 12th. I urge anyone who thinks Trinidad won that round clearly to re-watch it. Trinidad is coming forward and chasing De La Hoya down but misses mostly everything he throws. It fools you a little as De La Hoya is on the defensive back pedalling but actually seems to make it a close round by landing more.

Just watch the round and look out for clean punches landing. Forget about Trinidad coming forward and De La Hoya on the retreat. You'll more than likely agree that it could have gone either way.

 

It was Oscar by 2. Will have to find the fight again and re-score it.

 

When I saw the fight on ppv I knew DLH had won the fight when it ended, despite him fighting defensivly the last three rounds. Me and the other three or four guys watching it were all surprised Tito got the decision. I've rewatched it once and still scored it for DLH, 7-5. Bad decision.