Respected columnist Dan Rafael's thoughts on Calzaghe

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigReg, Dec 16, 2008.


  1. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    because like i said in my next post - hes a better fighter than that
     
  2. BadJuju83

    BadJuju83 Bolivian Full Member

    3,941
    2
    Sep 19, 2008
    He definately wated his prime, you get no argument from me on that.
     
  3. The Prophet

    The Prophet Active Member Full Member

    1,352
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    Don't waste your time. Its not about the promotion or Rafael or the state of boxing, and of course its not about RJJ. Its a Hate Thread pure and simple. The OP is from Philly and he hates Calzaghe (gee I wonder why?) and wants to push his anti-Calzaghe agenda. It doesn't matter what Joe does or says and if other boxers are guilty of the same thing. Joe could not pay his water bill and he'd be on here saying "what an *******, he doesn't pay his water bill and yet he drinks water, what a hypocrite!" Its really pathetic and getting old.:-((
     
  4. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007

    I want you to find all of the threads where I have criticised Calzaghe, you'll be hard pressed to find them. I fully admit that I don't like Calzahge. However, that's been the case long before he fought Hopkins. Taylor beat Hopkins twice and I don't dislike him. Adamek just beat Cunningham and I don't dislike Adamek. However, prophet, I see you dogging out Williams all the time and making up lies about him while also constantly big upping Margarito. I wonder if that's a coincidence.:think
     
  5. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    thats very childish. hes replying to me and i'm not from "philly".

    either defend the point or don't...

    but don't just reply and dis someone becuase you dont know how to respond.

    lets see you do it without whining on people...go....
     
  6. The Prophet

    The Prophet Active Member Full Member

    1,352
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    I don't make up lies, I just state facts and back it up with independent 3rd party evidence, not press statements from the parties involved after the fact. If the facts so happen to not be favorable to a certain fighter than so be it. You on the other hand make claims to either hate or nuthug. I'm still waiting for the evidence from you about your claim that Magarito and Top Rank were offered to replace Cintron and fight an immediate rematch with Williams and turned it down. And like I said, if you provide it to me, I'll concede the point.
     
  7. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    reply to my post if you state "facts".

    but you dont...you're always on the defensive when you post and you havent answered a post straight up yet.
     
  8. The Prophet

    The Prophet Active Member Full Member

    1,352
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    Someone's gotta defend the truth from all the Hater Propaganda:bbb.

    Your post? There's no facts to state. Your post is simply your opinion on why people should hate Calzaghe and not Roy Jones, your "reasoning" being that RJJ made his name on the world stage (whatever that means) before Calzaghe and Calzaghe didn't bother to pursue US recognition (do they give out a certificate for that?) as hard as you think he should've. Its nothing but opinions with a strong tinge of :fire, on a thread that quoted an opinion column with a strong tinge of :fire. Arguements and opinions can be made that all 3 of them (RJJ, BHop, JC) dodged people and put their foot in their mouths on more than one occassion. I'm not gonna sit here and analyze and hate on these guys for what they say outside of the ring. I'm more interested in what they do inside of it.
     
  9. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    As I've already said, I'm waiting for you to provide evidence that Williams turned down fights with Clottey and Margo after Cintron pulled out. A press release where Clottey is mentioned as a potential opponent is not proof that a fight was turned down by Williams.
     
  10. The Prophet

    The Prophet Active Member Full Member

    1,352
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    There you go, making stuff up again to trying to squirm out the corner you're in. I said PW (Goosen really) opted (feel free to go back and look) to fight Quintana when Clottey and Margarito were willing and available, and I likened that to cherry picking or ducking. You then called me a liar, tried to prove me wrong and then conceded (the Clottey point) that you couldn't when you looked at the facts, and then claimed AM and Top Rank were offered to replace Cintron but turned it down. All I am, is asking you to prove your claim and all you do is keep sidestepping. Hmm, I wonder why?:think
     
  11. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    That's my point you never once proved this, never. Had you proved this, I would be more than happy to show why I say Margo turned down a shot at Williams after Cintron pulled out. You won't even admit that your so called proof doesn't prove your point at all.
     
  12. The Prophet

    The Prophet Active Member Full Member

    1,352
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    The article I refenced from this very site before the fight clearly stated that the author was told by Goosen that the fighters under consideration to replace Cintron for the WBO title shot were Judah, Collazo, Clottey, and Quintana. Logic would presume that they wouldn't consider fighters that weren't available especially on short notice and that any fighter would jump at the chance to fight for a belt, especially Clottey who up to that point was fighting to just the recognition he felt he deserved and had left Dibella for Top Rank in an effort to speed up the process. There no evidence that any of them turne down the fight. And as evidenced by history, Goosen picked the weakest guy out of the bunch, and lost.

    Logic would also presume that a guy (Margarito) that went out of his way to petition the WBO and become Williams mandatory would not turn down the fight if offered. You said he did turn it down. I'm calling bull**** and asking you to prove it. You are refusing.

    The situation that happened then is really not unlike the situation that's happening now, with Margarito and Top Rank opting to fight Mosely and Cotto for the time being. Opting, cherry picking, ducking, take your pick.

    The difference between you and I is that you accept one scenario, but deny the other, which is why you're a nuthugging hater.:fire:deal
     
  13. SAS2

    SAS2 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,173
    2
    Jun 24, 2006
    Raphael is a lard-assed **** who used to get his mommas cookies taken from him in the schoolyard.

    The idiot picked Jones over Calzaghe, so he has no right to open his trap. He also picked hoppy over joe.

    Scru u fat boy.
     
  14. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Did you know that Mosely was also under consideration and turned down the fight? Did you also know that Judah turned down the fight as well? Again, you're missing the point. You don't know why those fighters weren't picked. Being that you don't know, claiming Williams turned down a fight with Clottey is a stretch to say the least. Numerous times you have claimed that Top Rank is trying to put a fight together between Williams and Clottey. However, Goosen has yet to be contaced by Top Rank for that fight. Top Rank has made no statements regarding that fight. If Top Rank is so ready to put Clottey in there with Williams, how come there has been no effort on their behalves to make the fight? And again, Clottey was in line for a shot at the IBF belt. He did not need Williams to get a belt. Collazo had a chance to fight Williams for the WBO belt but balked because he was in line for the WBC belt.

    I have no doubt Clottey would fight anyone. However, he can't do **** without his promoter. What has Top Rank done for him? Arum barely even speaks to him.

    Again, you're operating off of assumptions. You don't know why those other fights didn't come off.

    Logic would dictate that Arum wouldn't put Margo in there with Williams again and risk ruining the Cotto fight, again. You can say whatever you want about petitions, but a lot changes over the course of a few months. Team Margo claimed they were tired of waiting on Williams and moved on. And while you're recounting Margo's actions, do you recall that he said he would never fight Williams again unless Arum promoted the fight? Do you really believe Arum would promote that fight when it was in his best economic interest to make the Cotto fight instead?

    Here's the difference; we have, in writing, a letter from Goosen offering Margo $4 million for a fight with Williams. We also have a letter from Arum turning down the fight. Right there, that's irrefutable, physical evidence that they turned down a fight with Williams. In concern with Williams turning down fights with Clottey and Margo, all you have is flimsy circumstancial evidence and assumptions.
     
  15. Ischbaad

    Ischbaad Active Member Full Member

    1,012
    0
    Dec 4, 2008
    Dan Rafael needs to get off De La Hoya's *****. The man has no integrity what so ever. Just a biased mother****er.