Resume is a none vital element when assembling a respectable P4P list...

Hey China Joe, did you really say that? If he doesn't respond, does anyone have any proof of this?

 

So find your balls and name some. Aside from the names that a chimp could throw up and reasonably justify.

Remember you need 100, so lets have a few that would be in the lower range.

 

I don't know how to explain it more clearly, sorry.

 

Ding, ding, winner?

 

:dead

 

More hot air than a balloon as usual.

I think you just realised how stupid that statement was didn't you? It's ok, we'll sweep it under the carpet. You couldn't even name 50 more talented fighters in the last 20 and we both know it.

 

Pot. Kettle. Black.

:hi:

 

I skimmed through his posts to find this;


Originally Posted by MrMagic
What about your bet that "IF HOPKINS SIGNS TO FIGHT JOE, YOU WOULD LEAVE ESB FOREVER".

Your word is not worth anything right now, so don't come on here making some bets, you're a fraud.

 

The joke thread starter is running from me, he can't back up his own god damn bets.. why should anyone regard him as anything else than a comic relief. :deal

 

You would have to rank Superman no.1 p4p. Clearly, no one would be able to beat him. How could anyone rank ahead of him if no one would ever be able to beat him?

 

Who doesn't, though? Outside of your CRONIC calzaghe fanboy, of course...

 

The example doesn't hold water because unlike any other boxer, Superman has no weaknesses. He basically flicks everyone to win. Most boxers however can look very impressive against 1 opponent so therefore H2H they > that opponent, but against another opponent they may loose cos of styles. Goes back to rock paper scissors example. With this we can conclude that without a list of names, variety of top fighters, its difficult to gauge just how good you are H2H overall. Therefore p4p is simply who is the best fighter, taking perceived ability into account with resume as a backing.

A great example of this would be Pac-MAB-Morales saga.

MAB and Morales are equal. Pac BLITZES MAB much more impressive than Morales win over him ever was. Without seeing Pac fight anymore elites, are we to automatically claim that Pac is no.3 p4p(MAB's ranking then) and assume he blitzes Morales too? The point is, Morales does beat Pac...youre only as good as your opponent and the more elite opponents on your resume, the better case you make for yourself.

 

In essence, anybody that can not be beaten without ridiculous weight disadvantages should be p4p #1 regardless of resumes

It's how you actually agree on whether they have that sort of raw ability from one fight against a journeyman that is the question. People are not neccessarily blessed with CHJ's god given talent to analyze a fighter effectively.

 

Case in point.

 

:?

You can't interpret English correctly nevermind a fighter.