**Resume : Pacquiao v. PBF: who has the best resume**

At this point, it's not relevent

 

Mayweather's is far better. More relevant wins at natural weights.

 

At this point people can still argue, but after May 2nd it's all about who won the fight.

 

Floyd's resume is garbage. Yes, the 47-0 is impressive but when you really break it down fight by fight, the last half of his career is full of unimpressive wins, fights that he was already the glaring favorite in and SUPPOSED to win. And then you look and see what opponent was actually elite and prime and there isn't many on Floyds resume. You have to go all the way back to corrales and castillo, early 2000s. And then you say, what other ATGs has he beaten that were still around their prime and the answer is ONE. Hernandez, but then you look at Genaro and see oscar whooped him more impressively before Floyd did and when Genaro was undefeated!
Floyd's resume leaves alot to be desired.

As for Pac, the man has losses, yes. But he's beaten some beasts and done it in stunning fashion, morales and barerra, TWO ATGS close to prime.

At the end of the day, Floyd has the better record but Pac has the better wins over quality opponents and do rate pac higher than Floyd on the ATG list because of this.

 

atsch

 

That is just it. Pac is a legend, a great fighter, but compared to true welterweight beasts like prime Tito, Mosley, De la hoya, Whitaker, he isn't on their level. And those guys beat both Floyd and Pac prime for prime.

 

It's about the same but floyd have a slight edge if you look at the resumes closely. Pac face most name guys that were either past their primes, weight drain or just shot decline with fighters like barrera, morales, de la hoya, cotto, mosley, margarito, hatton. So pac best win vs guys in their primes was against marquez in the 2nd fight at junior lightweight and bradley at 147 pounds.



Now with floyd? It's like basically the same thing except he beat guys in their primes that was at their best in corrales, castillo, judah, hatton. I was going to say canelo but that fight was at 152 pound catchweight.

 

^^^You clearly prove you aint a real boxing fan but a dumb pac****.

 

The contradiction's are crazy there is nobody in Floyds weight range that would be a favorite over him PAC supossedly rated higher and even he has wasn't favored to win. Compare situations fight by fight and you would understand a good win for PAC is Morales in the middle is a 6 FIGHT LOSING STREAK, Floyd fight's top champ after top champ not beaten up fighters.

 

truth is pac has a few BIG names on his resume from the loser weights, but currently the 2nd best name on his resume laid him out and hold the edge in their rivalry , Floyd has had the way tougher resume.

pac would have way more losses in he fought floyds whole resume when the fights happened. Floyd would easily be undefeated with pacs resume

 

where you get your crystal bro?

 

There's almost no point in debating in threads like this. You have people seriously suggesting that the version of Hatton who fought Pacquaio was "more prime" than the one who fought Mayweather. Lol.

You then get to this ridiculous "8 titles" fallacy.

 

that's stupid, they both had defeated 7 fighters going into the HOF. pac has 11 wins against 7 HOF opponents, Floyd has 7 wins over 7 HOF opponents

and you're missing Canelo who WILL be HOF bound so that EIGHT

and one major fact that always gets left out, in every division in every championship fight where Floyd was fighting for someone elses belt, he ALWAYS took on the real champ of said division.

how about one of pac cult leaders check into those 8 weight divison championship BS, I wonder how many times he fought the LEGIT champ or known top belt holder in said division.

Floyd ALWAYS took the top dog of every single division, pac has NOT done that. i'll go further, I think pac consistently went after weaker belt holders, that just how I remember most of the matches but I could be wrong. if I am boxing clown should be ALL over this.

I'll wait, I know time is needed to rewrite history

 

well, Floyd and pac prime is NOT at ww,.

their true prime were like 135 for pac and 140 for Floyd. that was their primes which makes me laugh when they are always compared and in fantasy fights with fighters that dwarf them and are literally 2/3/4 weight classes above them prime for prime

 

Really don't know how people can say MAB was past is prime when he won 8 straight before that and 6 straight after.