Reverse Carnera debate challenge

I’m waiting to sit back and see ANY input worth debating from your side of the Carnera question. I take it you can provide the reverse view of your opinion?

How constructive. You have demonstrated nothing to back this statement up with.

This is completely valid. It is very hard for bigger men to pin down 100lb lighter opponents with full force. Against lighter and faster moving men Primo resorted to lighter arm punches with less follow through in order to land. Effective for him because of the disparity in size. If you have boxed against faster men you will know that faster scoring blows toward a moving target are often of the arm punch variety. The effort involved in producing a more levered correct blow is easier delivered upon a sitting target. The distance a weighted pull back blow travels is easily read, especially the right hand from the back foot. So when there is a speed deficit technique always suffers.