Rewatched both fights of Golovkin vs Canelo MAN GGG WAS ROBBED!

1st fight draw 2nd fight Canelo

 

Bull Feces & you know it

 

Better fights out there for him. Canelo kills GGG in a 3rd fight and after canelo destroyed ggg in the fight these same people begging for the fight won't give canelo an ounce of credit for the win, a fight they wanted I may add.

 

Canelo left it too late. He lost the support when he blatantly ducked GGG the first time & the Mexican fans named him El Pollo. Then he got a bogus draw when he did fight GGG. When the rematch was on Canelo popped dirty for Clenbutrol & the fight was cancelled. In the rematch GGG boxed his ears off but got the "Vegas Shaft". Add to all this the cherry picking , blatantly biased officiating, short camps for opponents etc . You are now left with a Ped's abusing , cowardly, Diva. Biggest shame is he can fight but chooses the easy corrupt path instead. As the saying goes he " **** his own nest"

 

All GGG ever wanted from Oscar, the NSAC, & vegas boxing officials was a fair crack of the whip against Canelo . Sadly he never got it. But GGG's resume >>>>>>>> Clenelo El Pollo

 

We know this. Canelo should focus on building his legacy by cleaning out 168. Maybe next February in 2022 he can take the Golovkin fight at 168 as a stay busy fight before a big showdown against a 168 champ or one of the 175 champs.

 

I scored it just like that on my first watch for each fight. I can see it being 2-0 for Canelo, hell, I can even accept some kind of biased score with GGG winning both, but what is beyond ridiculous is calling either fight a robbery. Those guys don't know what a real robbery looks like.

 

This..

 

Would you be ok with a draw and a loss for Canelo and for Canelo to move on? That would be ok right?

 

I have Castillo 1 and 1 with Floyd.

 

I didn't cry about it when DLH was robbed against Tito or Mosley. I just accepted it, new who really won, moved on and enjoyed boxing. I even continued following Tito's and Mosley's careers.

And those were TRUE robberies.

 

Good for you. See, everyone has the right to their own opinion.

 

And??

 

We're you active on the internet back then?

 

Were they? You can make an argument for both those fights being legit. Both very close. Versus Trinidad, Delahoya was flashier, but faded, he thought he had a larger lead than he did. Vs Mosley he faded again and Mosley came on strong. Both fights can go either way.