It was a close fight and nowhere near the "robbery" it's made out to be. I don't remember my round by round but bottom line it was close.
Sure ******, how did you score the fight? Yes the fight was competitive at times and some rounds were close, but that's because Pac was basically giving some rounds away (until he decided to take over again.) Bradley never posed a threat in that fight. Most of his shots were hitting gloves, aside from a few good few punches and some body shots. Pacquiao landed just about every significant punch in that fight, and he never had to get out of first gear to overcome Bradley.
its not about who poses a threat its about who wins more rounds, and your saying Manny was giving away some rounds, well ignorance is the only slavery son..... you give away rounds and wind up losing the fight you cant come back and argue well he posed no threat, the only thing you can do is blame yourself if you really did give away rounds, because winning rounds in the end is how you win on the score cards
Pacquiao only 'gave away' some of the very late rounds. His in-activeness in some others made the fight more competitive then it needed to be, but he still won most of those rounds. Aside from the late rounds, you could really only give Bradley 1 or 2 others unless your really stretching it.
"Competitive at times"...at what point was it not competitive, what series of rounds of rounds did manny dominate?
I gave Tim Rounds 1,2,3,7,10,11,12 Sorry but that 7th is really key if you gave that round to Pacquiao your just ****ing blind
He won most of the early rounds clearly. Up to the 9th you could argue him winning every one of those rounds. Bradley had 1 or 2 clear rounds, and those were probably towards the end where Pacquiao wasn't doing much.