Rewatched the pac vs bradley fight

and i must admit that i actually had bradley winning this fight 7-5...i gave him the first 3rds and the last 4 rds....i just dont get how compubox says pac landed all these punches when i saw him hit mostly gloves and air....his little flurries in the last 40 seconds of the rds were his downfall....the hbo commentators were just as worse especially lederman...they were dick riding pac because of past success but were to afraid to admit that pac looked like ****....i streamed the fight so the quality wasnt great...so i rewatched it on my hdtv and saw bradley dictating the pace from rds 1-3 and 8-12 and the rds in between were pretty close as well....i was screaming robbery calling up everyone but there was no robbery....if it was like that everyone needs to be calling the cotto mayweather fight a robbery as well....good fight and i hope they do it again

 

nah pac aint clearly beat him...watch the fight and not listen to the commentators or the crowd that screamed for air punches...ive been watching fights for over 20 years and this clearly was no robbery....a clear robbery would be chavez snr vs whitaker...thats a robbery

 

first off if u gonna name call get the **** off ....im giving my insight on the fight and how i saw it....i originally scored the fight for pac watching with the naked eye and listening to commentators and compubox....after re watching the fight i came to the conclusion of 7-5 bradley...there were a few rds were it couldve went either way...if u were scoring based on heavy shots then yea pac won a few close rounds but if were scoring ring generalship and a man using boxing and jabbing then bradley won rds 1-3 and 8-12....rd 8 i scored for pac but he was losing that rd until a late flurry...bradley was dictating the tempo in that rd and got lazy towards the end