rewatched the pac vs marquez 1

Doesn't really have any impact on the fight.

Also for the record, I had Marquez winning both.

 

dq no, point yes.....

 

Agreed.....a point if the ref felt it was intentional....which I doubt that it was. After all PAC isn't known for being a dirty fighter.

 

Yet a guy like Soto gets DQ'd and I watched the fight and it looked like he missed while that guy was down. And the guy turtled for a DQ.

 

agree with this one. a boxer is supposed to keep on attacking as long as the referee is not stopping him. IMO pac thought that the referee ain't gonna call a KD so he kept on punching. can't honestly blame him because it actually happened numerous times when a boxer stops attacking because he thought a KD is gonna get called but gets surprised because his opponent was able to get an assist from the ropes to keep himself getting floored.

 

Rules of boxing state that the hightlighted should be called a knock down. :good

 

That wasn't the case in Pac-JMM II. In the 3rd round of that fight, JMM held in to the ropes to avoid a knockdown. See 3:00 of this [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaKQpJvdabY[/ame]

Do you guys think that should have been ruled a knockdown given that JMM obviously put his hands on the ropes?

 

What a thread. Monumental stuff.

 

im glad i didnt because then we wouldnt have witnessed marquez putting an absolute boxing masterclass.

 

Not even a point. Marquez should of not tried to hold himself up.

 

thats a natural instinct

 

Natural instinct or not. Pac should not be deducted a point for hitting a guy who didn't know was going to be called a KD or not.

 

i agree

 

What a moron , this is why people like you will never become a referee (hopefully)

 

Not a DQ imo but JMM was exceptional after that round and was robbed