Rewatching the fight...It closer than i originally thought.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Phanekim, Dec 12, 2007.


  1. Phanekim

    Phanekim Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,929
    8
    Jan 6, 2007
    Round 1 - I had hatton winning it until pbf landed a few good shots in last 20 seconds of round.
    10-9 Mayweather.

    Round 2 - I had hatton. Both landed good shots, I thought Hatton dictated pace and his shots were more effective.
    10-9 Hatton

    Round 3 - Clear Mayweather
    10-9 Mayweather

    Round 4 - Clear Mayweather
    10-9 Mayweather

    ROund 5 - Clear Hatton
    10-9 Hatton

    Round 6 - I had Hatton landing some good shots to begin round and actually hurt PBF. On the deduction sequence, I had PBF hanging on to Hatton's glove after getting 2-3 good shots. You can make case Cortez shoulda been in there faster. However, Cortez had warned them both several times during fight.

    Concluding Notes

    * After this, I saw Hatton break down fundamentally. It turned into Corrales-Mayweather all over again.

    * I thought Cortez did a decent job. I thought he was for the most part fair, but it woulda made a more balanced exciting fight if he didn't break some sequences.

    * I wouldn't have taken a point off (for me one last stern warning) because Mayweather turned his back because he was grabbing hatton's glove. But i certainly understand what cortez was doing. I have pausing and slow motion, he doesn't.

    * Hatton's power was decent but not too good at WW.

    * Hatton did a great job of cutting the ring and his footwork was exemplary

    * I thought Hatton could have been slightly less predictable (right after breaks), I saw PBF time some great shots...

    * I felt the momentum was changing until the deduction, I basically had 3-2 Mayweather with Hatton winning the 6th and a PBF slowing down with it turning into a Hatton like fight.

    I thought the fight was very much closer than numbers or anybody tells you. That huge momentum shift in a sense cost Hatton 3 rounds (points). Not to take anything away from PBF, who is insanely skilled and deserved, but anyone who thinks Hatton sucks or will lose to anyone at 140 is sorta crazy.

    PS, i watched original fight on sopcast and have now d/led it and watched each round very closely.
     
  2. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
    hatton only won rd 5
     
  3. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
    where did you download the fight from??
     
  4. kel

    kel Boxing Addict banned

    5,897
    0
    Jan 20, 2007

    I just give him the first as well.....................but it can be argued the last 20secs Mayweather may have stole it.
     
  5. Marc

    Marc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,971
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    Watched the fight 3 times already, gave Ricky 2 rounds everytime.

    And Harold Lederman is still on crack. WHy he gave the 1st round to Hatton is beyond me.
     
  6. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
    because mayweather stumbled...lederman is shot though
     
  7. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    I remember having it 6-3. If I remember correctly, Floyd opened up in round 6 with some great shots and I believe had Hatton hurt badly. Then the next round, Floyd fell into Hatton's gameplan and I remember him winning that one.
     
  8. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    we can't post full fight downloads here. you could be banned for that ****.:good
     
  9. grayggr

    grayggr Active Member Full Member

    688
    0
    Apr 24, 2006
    I was drunk at the time and had Floyd for a clear UD before the stoppage. However it was not a one sided affair, some rounds being close, and Hatton certainly dictated the pace, as he normally does, but his punches were ineffectual. His footwork was excellent and always is, and he did stalk PBF. PBF was just too accurate when he landed and his defense too good. All of which we knew before the fight.
     
  10. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
    :lol: :good
     
  11. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
    hatton won 2 rds at best...his aggression was ineffective..and he wasnt landing clean...i couldnt score that **** for him...i only gave him the 5th..he got beat in every other rd
     
  12. Hrak

    Hrak Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,673
    2
    Mar 15, 2006
    I watched the fight yesterday and scored it 87-84, 6 rounds to floyd and 3 to Hatton. The round where hatton got a point deduction I scored 10-9, not 10-8.
     
  13. Phanekim

    Phanekim Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,929
    8
    Jan 6, 2007
    Since I am OP here are some responses....

    * Lederman's scorecard is wacked. I haven't understood his scoring for a while now.

    * I think this fight coulda been quite a fight had cortez not deducted the points going into the final rounds.

    * Although very unlikely, Hatton's best chance to beat pbf is a few years from now and hope PBF's desire for attention and his money spending ways catch up to him while his reflexes erode...
     
  14. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    I hate posters like that because those people who watched know that the fight was competitive till the point deduction. Those who havent seen the fight after reading crap posts like that will think that Mayweather just danced, smiled and potshoted Hatton for all the rounds. And THEN these posters go on to repeat what they have read to others. And I know that was the same case with DLH, after the fight people were talking about disputable decision, then how close the fight was, then 2-3 months later all we heard was that DLH barely won a round in that fight and Mayweather completly dominated toying with him.
     
  15. Hrak

    Hrak Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,673
    2
    Mar 15, 2006
    No I had it a draw