Rewatching Ward-Froch. Amazing how completely SOG schooled him.

Why in the world did the judges have it the way they did?

 

thats no joke fellaatsch try again.

bottom line is the cut had healed within a few weeks let alone months and also i don't buy into he broke his hand before the fight. during the fight yes, either way it doesn't matter because my point still stands... he postpones the fight cos of a tiny cut sustained in training over a month before the fight and yet we are supposed to believe he walked in the ring with a hand like a baloon.

 

Strange wasn't it? What was your card?

I thought it was ironic that the UK judge had it a near shutout to Ward, while the two North Americans had it closer. Perhaps they didn't want to appear overly biased towards Ward.

 

I'll admit that it is no way conclusive evidence but you cannot dispute that by walking into the ring carrying such an injury contradicts what ward said when he justified his postponing due to a cut.

 

ass hat... :rofl

 

You have no point, period...That was my whole point of calling you out on your lie.

Are you ok??

 

Im a fan of both guys, I was rocking an Andre Ward avi on here for time

Your preaching to the converted

 

fine fella

if you cannot see my point then you are thick mate.

alls i am saying is i don't believe the full story about the hand and those that do are entitled to do so

I just find it a pathetic injury to boast about and laughable that there are those clinging on to every word ward says as the complete truthatschmakes it even more pathetic imo.

 

Call me whatever the **** you want to...Still not gonna get your point across.

Just because you dont believe doesnt make it any less true...Its quite safe to say that you'll down anything that Ward says anyways...It works both ways!

 

he beat the **** out of froch . period. the hand is irrelevant whether it was or wasnt broke. not sure i get the point of talking about an injury that the guy won had

 

Indeed it works both ways fella:smooch you are reading and replying to what i am saying therefore my point is getting across, you just don't agree with it.. is fine.. anybody would think i am the butthurt one at the mere suggestion that wards injury was made out to be worse than it was..

 

atsch Dude, you're the one who told a bold face lie then tried to change the subject to his hand injury...Lets not forget how the conversation actually started...So yes, I disagree with your original statement.

You're the one who made up a pointless point since you tried to pass your bogus opinion of him pulling out of a fight due to cut! Please dont forget that!

 

try reading what i said correctly. i told no lies nor did i change any subject, just merely pointed out that ward pulled out of the first fight meaning it was postponed due to a tiny cut. With this in mind i have a problem in believing that when they did fight that ward walked into the ring with a badly injured hand. See - no changing of subject nor is it hard to comprehend unless you are stupid that is:blurp