Rewatching Ward-Froch. Amazing how completely SOG schooled him.

that fact that you are asking me to explain this speaks volumes

postpones a fight due to a small tiny cut that would have healed. stated no way do i fight in the biggest fight of my career unless 100%.

then a few months later enters the fight of his life not 100% with a hand that had blown up enough to be fractured in two places.

do the math:good

 

I'm shocked at the amount of hate Froch gets from Americans on here :-( Win, lose or draw the guy's the warrior and deserves better

 

that cut wouldn't end a fight and you know it, nigh on 6 weeks for it to heal was more than enough.

Obviously broken hands do not constitute a fight being stopped. What they do is put the fighter at a severe physical disadvantage. You know, the type of disadvantage that a fighter may well end up loosing badly because of. A cut that would have healed is not in the same league. Not that you care to believe anything other than words you are fed you silly impressionable yank. It's ok though, i know you can't help it

 

****ing brilliant

 

This thread is weird. Why are you giving Lewisham **** when he's a big fan of Ward and said Froch won 2 rounds at best ?You seem to be confused.
































Ass-hat:tong

 

I've posted in it , basically kissing Ward's arse and admitting he beat Froch comfortably and impressively. Jesus.

 

sorry, you confuse me for somebody who hasn't come to terms with the fact that ward beat froch whilst at some point injuring his hand. I just don't believe it was as bad as he claimed before the fight.:deal

the cut would have healed enough to represent less of a risk than getting into the ring with a hand that in wards own words:

"The way it was looking and feeling, I was very concerned the night before the fight."

 

this poster slothrop has a habit of not reading what others are saying and owning himself it seems