thats the problem with *******s like yourself. you have no concept of context. Just because Margarito was good 2 years ago doesn't he was good when Pacquiao fought him 24 months later. In your delusional world,because Margarito was once good 2 years ago, we can ignore the fact that he was caught cheating, got destroyed by Mosley, had a 1 and half year ring lay off, new trainer, looked horrible his last 2 fights, etc. He sucked when Pacquiao fought him. That is just a simple undeniable fact, no matter how much you try and twist it. Such a horrible attempt to give credit where credit is not due. There is this thing called time, and people either get better or worse when time passes. Every opponent Pac faced on that list got much worse in the 24 months that passed. Please at least be objective, you just look like an obsessed fan when you make a point like that. *******s, like the poster demonstrates, are frozen in time, where every opponent Manny Pacquiao faces is in their primes because they were once good 24, 46, 64 (doesn't really matter to them) months ago.
Title Vacant 1. Antonio Margarito 2. Miguel Angel Cotto 3. Shane Mosley 4. Joshua Clottey 5. Manny Pacquiao 24 months ago and to day this is an overrated group. Only Pacquiao and Mosley are top level boxers. Cotto is good but not great and would not beat Beat Mosley in a rematch if they had one.