Rex Layne v These 80's Guys

12-3 if he’s lucky
Possibly as low as 7-8 but I don’t see that happening. In these “fantasy” matchups I’m figuring take the best Layne available. Same guy that can out point Walcott and KO Williams conqueror Satterfield can surely beat the majority of this list

 

Loses to literally all of them.

 

He might have a career trajectory not unlike them, but for different reasons.

I could see him picking up a strap, then burning out quickly, and ending up as a stepping stone on the resumes of other contenders.

 

Pretty much this. Depends on alot of factors, like the condition at which his opponents show up

 

If we're matching the best Layne against these men - shouldn't they also be allowed to be at their best?

 

Layne was more consistent than 90% of em, feel like that would be a good advantage in a realistic situation.

 

why wouldn’t they be? Maybe with the exception of Norton as the author wrote old Norton

 

Individually, I would bet against him in every single match-up.

Collectively, he might pull an upset.

 

I could see him being comparable to a renaldo snipes or to a lesser extent Quick Tillis. He establishes himself as a contender but doesn’t stay there long

 

Lmao only brought him up because you decided to insult Layne on a Walcott thread because you are biased like you stated earlier. I’m also very disappointed that you would think Layne would lose to all these nobodies (exception of Spinks Ruddock Tucker Cooney and Douglas and evening then some are questionable). Do you despise Marciano so much that you must put down everyone he met? How many ranked wins do most of these men have? I’m not doing the math here but I’m pretty certain Layne has more wins then most of these guys. None of these guys are as good as Walcott was when he beat him.