This is an open forum anyone who wants to can contribute, Its a pity you haven't found the minerals to answer my repeated question. No matter I posted my earlier remarks which prove conclusively I did not insult Walcott. I have insulted you though, and you thoroughly deserved it! You called am a Hater and made a lying accusation which you didn't have the balls to defend. So Coward & Liar!
I posted it dopey! Before you did!!!! Look two posts up from when you posted it. Just didn’t post right but it’s there. And you are a hater face it. Not insulted at all lol. As far as Seamus goes I could care less what that racists opinions are.
Seamus is not a racist and I am not a hater . But you, **** me! I make a thread about Rex Layne versus 80s heavies and it's a hate on Marciano? I didn't mention his name until you brought it into the thread and I then had to remind you the thread was about Layne not him, you ridiculous clown! You're not insulted that I called you a liar and a coward? I'm not surprised ,I suppose you 've got used to it! Seriously you need treatment!
I accept your apology for being wrong about accusing me of being a coward. You know why you posted this. Don’t act like you’re not playing games and get all outraged. Seamus showed his true colors awhile ago and let the cat out of the bag. I know how he feels about white boys in boxing.
I had a colonoscopy today, so references to rectums and hurt butts are particularly meaningful to me at the moment.
I havent apologised to you and I wont you flat out LIED. I did not insult Walcott and you ****ing well know it you just havent the balls to admit it! Outraged ?You bet I am, I'd spit in your ****ing face if you were in front of me,you lying turd! You're ****ing sick fella.
I am not sure whether we can really call Layne's win over Charles a robbery. Ring Magazine scored it even, which suggests that it was more in the controversial decision category.
You weren’t trying to degrade Walcott by suggesting someone of Laynes level was able to beat him so anyone of the 80s era could? NOw who’s lying?
It's a public forum which means: A) I get to post insightful, dispassionate commentary backed factual evidence B) You get to ball up your emotions and rant like a teenage girl defending her fave boy band crush.
You have zero insightful, technical, or factual based arguments. You do have the capacity but rarely do so. Usually it’s just mock the other individual for believing in fairytales. No offense but you should grow up. And maybe just maybe get over your fear of short white men.