Rex Layne vs Samuel Peter

Well Layne was undoubtedly world class and although he came in under 200 lbs in most of his major fights he was not exactly small. He also wen't toe to toe with some people who were more formidable punchers than Peter.

A prediction of this type should always be backed up by some peice of data from the real world. For example it is poor pracice to pick sombody to do to a world class fighter something that they were never able to do to a world class fighter in the real world.

 

The Sam Peter that torn apart Maskaev , who was much bigger, stromnger, harder hitting and better than Layne is my example. I'd find abother but I cannot find a fighter as small as Layne that Peter ever thought.

As far as your theory on predictions goes, I suggest you set the bar and parameters for the entire Classic section instead of tailoring it to one particular thread.