Ricky Burns v Liam Walsh Dec 15th

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Jack Dempsey, Oct 23, 2012.


  1. Stunkie

    Stunkie Member Full Member

    494
    0
    Jun 2, 2012
    A kid with less than 15 pro fights fighting for a world title and they are happy to sanction that? More excellent work :patsch
     
  2. bam bam

    bam bam Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,589
    0
    Mar 30, 2010
    I like Burns and Walsh but this is a load of shite. Walsh is nowhere near ready.
     
  3. Let's Boogie!

    Let's Boogie! "Smooth Operator" Full Member

    2,148
    0
    Oct 16, 2010
    **** fight! Frank should know by now we're not idiots!

    I'm cancelling boxnation now.
     
  4. diggler

    diggler Active Member Full Member

    954
    0
    Jan 12, 2010
    He's 12 in the rankings so i doubt they had much choice
     
  5. perspicacity

    perspicacity Raising The Bar Full Member

    4,901
    0
    Nov 25, 2010
    Aye, this is shite. :-(
     
  6. Let's Boogie!

    Let's Boogie! "Smooth Operator" Full Member

    2,148
    0
    Oct 16, 2010
    I think I would e preferred Scott harrison.
     
  7. Jonsey

    Jonsey Boxing Junkie banned

    11,130
    0
    May 17, 2011
    agree
     
  8. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    Poor Ricky... A lose lose fight if ever I saw one. Walsh will def give a good account of himself. This is a bit like Calzaghe- starie
     
  9. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    Theres absolutely nothing wrong with Burns fighting Walsh, it just shouldn't be for the belt
     
  10. craney91

    craney91 Boxing Addict banned

    4,934
    0
    Mar 23, 2012
    Now, I just want to point something out folks, this is what I received yesterday:

    This was my post:

    This is the reply from Billy Nelson:

    Not having a go at Billy Nelson or Ricky Burns, because they aren't making the fights, but a Kevin Mitchell 2, John Murray, or even Michael Katsidis 2, is a better fight than Liam Walsh, who I might add, is ranked 59.

    Who is laughing now? :lol:

    I swear, if his fanboys come in here with the same old ****. "He'll do Broner" "Ricky Burns is the best" "Ricky Burns is world class because he has fought, Katsidis, Moses and Mitchell" "How is Broner world class when he hasn't even had a fight at lightweight" :tired

    Yes, who is it against, and what for? Forget it being the first fight.

    It's De Marco for the WBC, Burns and his camp were talking about unifying belts and stepping up, Liam Walsh? Really?

    Nothing against Walshy or Ricky, W-arren is making the fights, but Ricky is looking upwards, is this an upwards fight?

    :lol: COME ON fanboys "Ricky Burns isn't domestic level" He may well not be I agree, but you cannot deny he is being kept at the level by poor fight match ups and bad promotion. :good
     
  11. Jonsey

    Jonsey Boxing Junkie banned

    11,130
    0
    May 17, 2011
    How can Broner vs DeMarco be for the Ring title at Lightweight?
     
  12. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    This fight will be over inside 6 rounds IMO, Walsh is getting hit more and more. I expect Ricky's strength and range to trouble the lad and i can see the trainer pulling Walsh out around the 6th.

    Poor fight, Ricky's is just skirting the edges. 2013 it has to be Unification time.
     
  13. bam bam

    bam bam Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,589
    0
    Mar 30, 2010

    My thoughts exactly.
     
  14. Lilo

    Lilo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,947
    2
    Jul 6, 2010
    Simply not acceptable for a title fight but the WBO will sanction it as he is the WBO Euro champion. WBO made their bed when they conjured this title.

    Wrong weight, wrong time, wrong, wrong, wrong.
     
  15. craney91

    craney91 Boxing Addict banned

    4,934
    0
    Mar 23, 2012
    I thought it was, at least I was told it was. I quoted that post, the post was done before I was corrected later on in another thread, therefore it says ring because I didn't change it. :good