Ricky Burns vs winner of Crolla and Murray

It's a good job he'll be facing Burns then. !::hi:

 

I think you can put your mortgage on Burns facing the winner of Murray vs Crolla. It makes good business sense and ultimately in boxing.......money talks.
Champions hardly ever face champions, as no promotor wants to risk losing his cash cow.

I've followed Ricky's career since he lost to Alex Arthur and the very top LWs do seem to be giving him a problem.

He was behind on all 3 judges cards when Gonzalez either swallowed it or was genuienly injured.

Beltran should definitely have got the decision, we all know that in our heart of hearts.

Crawford didn't impress me much on the night but in retrospect, after I'd taken off my Burns coloured glasses, he beat Burns tactically. He's a slick tricky switch hitter and beat Burns pretty handily. Even whilst cheering on Ricky, on the night, I had Burns losing by 4 or 5 so the scores were spot on IMO. I don't think Crawford will be a great champion, or the next big thing, as he appeared to not have a huge dig.

Burns' apparent new habit and / or tactic of lying on the ropes in the last three fights is really starting to baffle me. I had thought it was an abberation in the Gonzalez fight and then an excusable survival tactic in the Beltran fight but then again on Saturday he was doing it again. Perhaps it's a rope-a-dope tactic but it's not working, is it?

For the failings or potential failings of Burns' last three fights I'd personally like to see him get a confidence building win at domestic level.

IF IF IF Burns lost his next fight to another top ten international opponent then what?

IF IF IF Burns lost to Murray or Crolla then we'd all have to admit that Ricky has peaked and that he's not world level any longer.

 

John Murray is easy to hit, he just walks forward with little head movement, Simpson should have boxed on the backfoot in and out and probably would have caught Murray all night long and then got out of trouble.

Until Murray starts to defend a bit more and moves that head as soon as he steps up he gets beat, he's already proved that.

 

I would like to see the fight, I don't rate Crolla and see him losing to Murray, Burns at his best handles both but Ricky has been struggling of late and Murray may think Ricky is for the taking.

 

Why not? plenty of World class fighters of the past have held British titles and defended it. What about fighters like Stracey (Dave Green), Minter(Sibson) and McGuigan(McDonnel) who actually come unstuck against up and coming British fighters after their title reigns. Ken Buchanan was in the ring with Jim Watt in a British title fight a year after the Duran fight.

 

Look what you've gone and done now bullshitting Bill.... you've only gone and put your foot in it. :-(

Can't wait to see how you bull**** your way out of this one Billy. :think

 

I think someone is a tad obsessed with Billy.

 

Yeah, most of the ******s who post in here who get all butt hurt whenever someone gives him ****.

****ing fannies. :nut

 

There's only one fanny on the boards pal and I'm replying to him

 

They were they good all days mate, but to be honest they are long gone. Back in those days they were only ONE world champ per division, but now we have four, so anything but a world title fight for Burns next will be a step backwards IMO.
The way I see it Crolla and Murray didn't deserve a fight with Burns before the Crawford fight, so they don't deserve a fight now just because Ricky got beat.

 

Put perfectly!

 

The way Vasquez totally outboxed Shafikov proves that he's borderline euro level, Ricky will fight a world class fighter on his return