ricky burns

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by evomax, Oct 19, 2013.


  1. sikeside

    sikeside Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,383
    0
    Sep 5, 2010
    Aye hes fuked mate, career over, no prospects, what will he do?
     
  2. Gravy

    Gravy Member Full Member

    252
    0
    Oct 19, 2013
    Ricky will comfortably win the rematch, as it's extremely unlikely the Mexican-yank will land such a lucky punch again (and he still pathetically didn't have the skills to earn the win then! :lol:). Afterwards it shall be on to unifying with Vazquez/Abril for the Scottish warriour :bbb
     
  3. Jquik

    Jquik Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,504
    0
    Mar 31, 2013
    Ricky always has his job in DW to fall back on.
     
  4. Jquik

    Jquik Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,504
    0
    Mar 31, 2013
    Learn to spell or **** off with your drivel.
     
  5. Gravy

    Gravy Member Full Member

    252
    0
    Oct 19, 2013
    You a yank? 'Warriour' is the proper English spelling, you muppet.

    Love how you cheaply latched onto that, as obviously you couldn't refute my sound points :hi:
     
  6. Macky

    Macky Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,486
    0
    Feb 10, 2011

    Yeah, that is true.....whats your point?

    I can name 5 Britsh Lightweights better than the 2 above
     
  7. Macky

    Macky Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,486
    0
    Feb 10, 2011
    Hahaha this is Billy Nelson i think

    only he spells Katsidis....KATSITAS

    Hi Billy :hi:
     
  8. REEVO

    REEVO Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,142
    2
    Mar 16, 2009
    Well when Burns fights Terrance Crawford it is all over for him, he will be pushed back down to domestic level, it makes me laugh such a good division and who has Ricky fought? Look at the good names out there He got lucky against Gonzalez, gift decision against Beltran and there not evem top 4..
     
  9. Barry Smith

    Barry Smith Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,570
    23
    Aug 13, 2012
    Burns is screwed, If he rematches Beltran he loses and if he fights Crawford he loses. He should have just got it over and done with and fought Broner, again he would lose but at least he'd get more money for it. Team Burns must be really regretting ducking Broner now.
     
  10. ChipChair

    ChipChair Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,231
    0
    Dec 7, 2012
    Why ? How many fights has he had since the Broner match was being talked about ? 2 ? then plus Crawford or Beltran match that's 3 fights he probably gets more from the 3 than one with Broner.
     
  11. Barry Smith

    Barry Smith Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,570
    23
    Aug 13, 2012
    But a unification fight with Broner would have been PPV which is were the real money is. Fighting in front of 6,000 fans in Scotland doesn't generate anywhere near that kind of money, not even if you do it 3 times.
     
  12. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    5
    Nov 7, 2009
  13. Barry Smith

    Barry Smith Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,570
    23
    Aug 13, 2012
    People were ******ed enough to buy utter garbage like Haye/Harrison. There are more than enough knuckle draggers out there who will buy any old crap if the media tells them to.
     
  14. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    5
    Nov 7, 2009
    Both big names, whereas Burns and Broner mean nothing to the casual sports fan in this country.
     
  15. sikeside

    sikeside Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,383
    0
    Sep 5, 2010
    anyone know what the hampden is yet?