Ricky Hatton most dominant champ @140...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IrnBruMan, Aug 12, 2007.


  1. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    ...EVER with the initials 'RH'.

    No argument, it's not even up for debate.

    This should be fun.
     
  2. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Pryor, Tszyu, and Chavez were all more dominating to name a few
     
  3. Sai

    Sai Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,955
    1
    Apr 4, 2007
    Agree fully!
     
  4. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    :nono

    Hatton beat the most dominant champ at 140 (Tszyu, who unified 140 for the first time in 32 years), therefore he is the most dominant champ at 140.

    No question about it.

    You are entitled to your opinion but that's all it is, compared to my FACTS.
     
  5. Fallow

    Fallow Active Member Full Member

    892
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    That does not make him the most dominant champ ever.

    That's like saying Hasim Rahman was the most dominant heavyweight champ ever after he sparked Lewis.
     
  6. Dantes

    Dantes ESB Magnate Full Member

    1,672
    0
    May 5, 2006
    I concur.:think
     
  7. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    I agree.
     
  8. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    Subscribe to the bigtime9 brand of logic or kick rocks kid
     
  9. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    You are entitled to your opinion kid, but it is worthless when placed next to my FACTS.

    Kick rocks kid, you're done :hat
     
  10. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    ok then, ill go and kick rocks, *****.:good
     
  11. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    Name a more dominant champ at 140.

    Don't worry, I'll wait :hat
     
  12. shelterr

    shelterr Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,886
    0
    Sep 7, 2006
    i agree. However he is the Lineal champ, dominant would mean that you faced and beat all of the top opposition while champ. Beating a near retired Tszyu and a Carlos Mausa who was lucky enought to run into a Vivian Harris meltdown, then moving up to welterwieght and squeaking by Collazo, just to go back down and beat Juan Urango and Jose Luis Castillo (who was fighting only his second fight at 140, the first being a nail biter to unknown Herman Ndougo) is not a sign of DOMINANCE. If he had beaten/beats Cotto, Harris, Torres, Malignaggi, Holt and Witter we could begin to talk about dominance. Ricky could still become the most dominant, but he simply hasnt fought enough tough opposition to be considered among names Tszyu, Pryor and Chavez. Each of these guys beats Ricky in their prime.

    There's your FACTS.
     
  13. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    Resume has nothing to do with it.

    You're talking about old school fighters.

    Get with the PG and start speaking contemporary kid.

    Name a more dominant champ at 140 in Hatton's era:deal
     
  14. shelterr

    shelterr Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,886
    0
    Sep 7, 2006
    Well if your saying he's the most dominant champ since '05 i'm not gonna argue. I think that's pretty well understood and is really not worth making a post about. But you said EVER at the top of your post and EVER is a load of ****.
     
  15. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    Pretty good.

    Oh, we're talking Ricky's era now. :roll:

    In that case, I agree, Hatton's the man. :good