Ricky Hatton vs Ken Buchanan at a catch weight.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Kryptonite, May 23, 2016.


  1. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    256
    Feb 5, 2005
    This post approximately my take on the fight.:good
     
  2. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    136
    Apr 23, 2012


    :lol::lol::lol::lol:

    Duran went on to bully Middleweights my ass. He out smarted SOME Middleweights, he certainly didn't bully them, especially the way in which he bullied Ken Buchanan.

    You can bull K B up all you like but the guy was British and Euro level, which is why he only defended his World title twice before losing it to Duran, and failed in another attempt 3 years later. Hatton WAS a strong Light Welter, and would have no trouble at all bullying Buchanan. I couldn't care less about Ken's counter punches they would have little or nothing on them, all he would be doing after the first four rounds is trying to protect his ribs.
     
  3. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,583
    Jul 28, 2004
    Hatton couldn't possibly have equaled Duran's showing vs Buchanan. No way he would have beaten Kenny.
     
  4. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,605
    Jan 30, 2014
    Good post. Don't know why people have so much trouble seeing Hatton, a very strong and aggressive junior welter and excellent body puncher pressuring and attacking Buchanan like Duran did. It's not like Buchanan gave Duran a decent fight or Duran had to dig deep to beat him. Looked to me like a much lesser fighter than Duran could have gotten the job done.
     
  5. Kryptonite

    Kryptonite Member Full Member

    246
    1
    Apr 2, 2016
    So he never Bullied light middleweight Davie Moore? He beat the absolute **** out of him.

    The rest of your post isn't worth mentioning.

    Trolling or completely re****ed.
     
  6. Kryptonite

    Kryptonite Member Full Member

    246
    1
    Apr 2, 2016
    Buchanan did have his moments in the Duran fight. Enough to keep it competitive.

    That version of Ken could probably beat Pac and your boy Mayweather.
     
  7. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,605
    Jan 30, 2014
    You thought the fight was competitive? I only saw two or three rounds to give Buchanan.

    Can't see it. I don't have strong feelings about Buchanan but I think that Mayweather outboxes him and Pacquiao probably runs all over him.
     
  8. Kryptonite

    Kryptonite Member Full Member

    246
    1
    Apr 2, 2016
    It was competitive in spells, Yes. There's a brilliant highlight reel that doesn't just show you all of Durans best work. Buchanan had some nice spells of class boxing as well as getting the better of a some exchange's. There is a reason Duran said Ken was the best he ever faced. I dont agree with that but he must have his reason.

    Mayweather probably does outbox Ken. Yes.

    As for Pac. Don't make me laugh. Pac was a sucker for counter punchers and is pretty one dimensional when facing clever movers. I think the best of Ken schools Pac at lightweight.
     
  9. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,103
    5,245
    Mar 22, 2015
    You're right Buchanan did have his moments in that fight, let's face it he was a class act.
    You could see though he was having to fight on the edge for every second of that fight, and while Hatton is no Duran I think for having to deal with constant pressure it wouldn't be as easy a nights work as some are saying.
     
  10. Kryptonite

    Kryptonite Member Full Member

    246
    1
    Apr 2, 2016
    Duran was also the dirtiest he's ever been in that fight. Unbelievable the amount of head butts he got away with.

    The Thing with Hatton is he's a limited puncher. Great at creating angles going to the body but up top he's limited. His punching technique is not the best either. Ken would have Hatton sussed early because Hatton's attacks are predictable, unlike Duran who was super tricky, unpredictable and a whirlwind of skill. Just because Hatton mauled Kostya doesn't mean he's doing the same to Ken. It's ridiculous to compare those two tbh.
     
  11. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,103
    5,245
    Mar 22, 2015
    I'm not comparing them at all in terms of skill, Duran was obviously the greater fighter.
    I just think Hatton's relentless pressure and persistence however crude (plus his skills weren't that bad) would give Buchanan an uncomfortable night, I just don't see this being a walk in the park.
     
  12. Kryptonite

    Kryptonite Member Full Member

    246
    1
    Apr 2, 2016
    Fair enough. I just think the difference in class and to be honest 'toughness' from Ken would make him a comfortable winner.
     
  13. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    136
    Apr 23, 2012
    Yet another fukin ESB moron, who wriggles and squirms when caught out. So much for Duran bullying Middleweights. You have now got him bullying the 154 pound Moore having only his 13th fight.

    Go away sh!t for brains.
     
  14. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    136
    Apr 23, 2012
    Tommy Hearns had oodles more class than Iran Barkley. A fat lot of fukin good it did him. Only jocks, fanboys or idiots think Buchanan had anything like the strength or power or even the work rate of Hatton.
     
  15. Kryptonite

    Kryptonite Member Full Member

    246
    1
    Apr 2, 2016
    Says the obvious English, Hatton fanboy 😂