People say he "only" has the Holyfield trilogy, but that seems a bit unfair. I think Holyfield was a great champion, and Bowe beat him when he was undefeated and near his best. Bowe beat him in a convincing manner, in a great fight. Bowe lost a close one to Evander a year later, and Evander had to put on one of his absolute best performances to do it. On the downside you can say Evander was on the slide already, and Bowe had past his peak (perhaps through lack of discipline). But still a great fight. When they fought again, Bowe became the first man to stop Holyfield. And he came off the deck to do it. Holyfield may have been sick or whatever (not Bowe's fault) but he was coming off a fairly decent performance against Ray Mercer. The Holyfield trilogy is THREE WORTHY PERFORMANCES from Bowe. They are top flight performances, even the one he lost wasn't a "bad" showing. Bowe also beat a good crop of young prospects, undefeated guys, fringe contenders. Not the top flight of the division but good young fighters, or undefeated fighters with a bit of ambition. Hide, Donald, Gonzalez, Mathis Jr. were all undefeated, a couple of them arguably top 10 (actually, scrap Mathis Jr. - Bowe should have been DQ'd there). Pierre Coetzer was a good strong fighter, Tony Tubbs was a seasoned contender. Seldon was still a decent prospect (who'd only been beaten once at that time). Jesse Ferguson had just schooled Ray Mercer when Bowe smashed him. These men dont make a particularly "good resume", but they aren't "NOTHING" either. They are an addition to the Holyfield trilogy. Let's face it, when someone makes a list of Sonny Liston's top ten wins, you'll probably see them picking Mike DeJohn, Wayne Bethea etc. out of the air. And similar thing for other champions, like Foreman or even Frazier. So let's not dismiss all the "mediocre" fighters Bowe beat ON TOP of Holyfield. Riddick Bowe's standing is affected by his manager's decision to duck Lennox Lewis, a stupid decision, IMO. The fight would have been big in 1993, and Bowe would have stood a good chance of winning. We may well have seen a better Bowe than ever if Lewis had been his motivation, and - win, lose or draw - that would have counted for more than two easy defences. I know Lewis fans like to say Bowe was frightened of Lewis but that doesn't square with what we otherwise know of Bowe - he was a warrior with a ton of heart. For all the guts he showed in the ring, he deserves the benefit of the doubt before being labelled "scared". Stupid, and easily-led more likely. His loudmouth manager Rock Newman seemed to have a gripe with the WBC that went back long before the Lewis issue (and the WBC are crooks anyway, so I cant really judge the origins of the dispute) and seemed to think easy defences and staying unbeaten was more important than taking the big fight and big money and staying truly "undisputed". I think Newman was wrong, and Bowe went along with it - he was hardly qualified not to. But to read this as "fear" seems a bit of a jump. How do Bowe's accomplishments and resume really stack up to the greats ? 2 wins over a prime or not-too-far-removed-from-prime Holyfield, and a close defeat to same. And a few okay wins over decent contenders or fringe contenders or good prospects. And when he lost, Bowe battled hard in defeat, didn't fold like a pack of cards (even counting the Golota wars, which some call "defeats"). I think maybe he gets dismissed a bit too harshly. But, for me, it's still an open question. Maybe he doesn't belong.
I'm glad you said this, because I feel the same way. I have always felt that the garbage can incident was Rock Newman's brainchild, not Bowe's. Newman was an odd character, to say the least. Granted, Lewis' spectacular knockout of Ruddock may have had something to do with Newman's decision (assuming of course, it was his) or it could have been nothing more than good old fashioned politics. Perhaps Newman wanted the hype concerning the two fighters to build and build, eventually cashing in heavily when the fight was eventually announced? Whatever the case, my personal viewpoint is that Riddick was more polished as a fighter than Lewis at that stage of their careers, and a win for Bowe would have been a distinct possibility. I think Riddick's problem was that he was by nature a lazy slob, to be honest. When on top form he was an excellent fighter, with the necessary size, power, durability and boxing smarts to be hell for anyone in that era. Question his commitment if you will, but there was nothing wrong with his heart or the overall package he brought to the ring. PS-I think he went 3-0 against Evander. I had him winning the 2nd fight by a single point.
If Bowe is underrated, it is utterly his own fault. Eddie Futch deserved a better, more dedicated final student.
Great post Sonny, Rock Newman was certainly a *****. He was constantly shooting his mouth off, starting fights with other fighters managers and basically making a spectacle of himself. I have always blamed him for Bowe not fighting Lewis, and felt that he did his fighter no service by being responsible for that fight not happening. As for Riddick's comp, I agree as well. One thing that is commonly overlooked, is that he was never Ko'd in his 45 pro fights, and took two out of 3 against the only man who beat him. That's coming pretty damn close to being undefeated if anyone asks me. The Golata fights did him no service, but I truly believe that Riddick was past his best, and Golata was fighting horribly dirty on top of everything else. I don't know how well I'd do if some body was constantly hitting me in the nuts all night long. Bowe indeed beat some good fighters like you say. Piere Coetzer was a better fighter than people give him credit for and was a solid number one contender in June of 1992, when they had there title elimination match. He was a sculpted specimen who was reasonably young at age 30, and was actively fighting beating decent comp before meeting Bowe. Seldon was an OK fighter. Gonzalez, Donald and Hide as you say were at least undefeated. Bowe has my vote as a top 15 or 20 guy.
Why did Futch deserve better ? Futch wasn't in there taking punches. What has Futch done to DESERVE so many champions ? Being a great trainer of great fighters actually relies on a lot of luck as well as expertise. Bowe may have been the best heavyweight fighter Futch brought to the title. Who's the competition ? Norton ? He was a later addition to Holmes and Frazier corners, if I remember rightly. Bowe seemed to be a fairly quick developer as a professional, so he obviously put some hard work into learning his trade. Sure, he regressed and got a bit fat when he made all that money, and probably left a lot of himself in the ring in hard fights. But it's easy to flippantly dismiss him as "lazy". He didn't look lazy in the ring with Holyfield for 30 rounds, and he never quit, and those fights were enough to take a lot out of any fighter. After that he took incredible beatings against Golota and never quit. There's no shame in that. Anyone who's been in the ring, and most fans who haven't, can respect what Bowe put into his fights. He was a warrior. He could have ate less, or run a few miles more, okay. But to imply he was a major let-down to HIS TRAINER (who got well paid for his troubles no doubt) is way off the mark, IMO. Bowe fought his heart out on more than one occasion. If his conditioning was below par, his heart was way above. I doubt Futch was disappointed in him. It's amusing that old trainers like Futch are revered as sacred cows, and we should feel sorry for them if their fighter's dont become the next Joe Louis. Allegedly, the trainer is infallible and perfect, and there's an ideal that the fighter has to live up to to be "worthy" of his trainer. But on the other hand it's okay to **** on the fighters who are in their taking the punches.
It's interesting that Newman was actually bad-mouthing Holyfield's credibility as a worthy challenger to Bowe not long before they agreed terms for a rematch. Newman was saying Holyfield should retire, and Bowe has no interest in fighting him again. His manner of negotiation was constantly hostile and provocative. All good managers play the mind games and act tough, but Newman was constantly in that gear of demeaning and rejecting Bowe's rivals. Lennox was not the only one, it wasn't an isolated incident, it just happens that they SHOULD HAVE fought Lewis, no ifs or buts. Newman was a *****, he acted high-strung, frienzied and emotional. Unhinged. The politics of boxing business is the sport's main drawback. Ironically, I think Bowe-Lewis needed Don King involved. But of course, King would have demanded options on whoever won.
If we list, say: DeJohn Machen Williams Foley Harris How do you think they stack up against Bowe's wins outside of Holyfield? (taking into account the stage of the career all were in when they fought, of course) I left Bethea off because i don't think anyone considers this a big win for Liston. He was a journeyman. Larry Donald was the best win outside of Holyfield, in my opinion. Bowe perhaps scared him a bit during that press conference. It's too bad Donald didn't fight good opposition after that fight until very late. He beat Valuev on my card in 2005 when he was 38 and shut Holyfield out. I don't give him the benefit of the doubt because there is no doubt. He was promised as title shot at Holyfield under the condition that he'd face the winner of Ruddock/Lewis afterwards. When Lewis knocked Ruddock out in impressive and one-sided fashion after Tyson went 17 knockoutless rounds with him, he then didn't want to keep his word and not fight Lewis. He rather gave up his title than to face Lewis. What did he do afterwards? He fought two nobodies. Remember that Lennox had stopped Bowe in two rounds during the olypmics. I don't see how there can be any doubt about Bowe not wanting any part of Lewis. He disgraced the championship and was steered away from dangerous fights/punchers his entire career, except for Golota who retired him and with stunning ease. Holyfield II was seen as an easy fight before hand and a repetition of a good big guy beating a good small guy.
Outside of the Liston wins you mention, he has two first round KOs of Patterson. I prefer Bowe's record against Holyfield to be honest. 1st round KOs prove something, but I think Bowe showed a bit extra against Holyfield (considering I rate Holyfield a lot higher than Patterson). Now, as to your question, Williams, Machen and Folley, DeJohn and Harris MIGHT be better than the other guys Bowe beat, but not by much, to be honest. Folley and Machen were rated highly at the time but I have my doubts whether they could have given a young Bowe as much trouble as Tubbs did. But I'll put them above Bowe's opposition on reputation alone. Harris was not good. DeJohn was tough and strong but otherwise ordinary. Cleveland Williams record was no better than Hide's going in. I'm no fan of Hide but Hide was ranked. Hide might have shook Liston like Williams did for a round or two, with his speed. (Bethea was probably better than Harris, IMO. But I'm no expert. Bethea lost a disputed decision to Folley or Machen if I remember rightly, and most of his losses were close) Hide was ranked. Donald was a good prospect. Tubbs was a contender. Coetzer might be on a par with DeJohn, let's be fair. Seldon was okay, but chinny, and Bowe did to him what Liston would do to a chinny fighter. How many of these guys would I favour Roy Harris against ? Not many, if any. Bull****, IMO. If Newman had said "okay I've got you $20 million for your next fight and it's Lennox Lewis", Bowe fights him. You're entitled to your opinion and you have laid out reasons but .... It's an unnecessary slur on the man, IMO. He should be condemned for the fact that he didn't fight the best fighter, but a charge of cowardice against a fighter who was a WARRIOR in the ring is unnecessary. You dont know his true feelings on the matter. His manager wanted him fighting easy fights, and, to his own discredit, he didn't go his own way. "Scared" is also a way of bolstering Lennox Lewis. Sure, Lewis was hot commodity after blasting Ruddock, but Bowe was just as highly acclaimed in the wake of his Holyfield victory. That's a slanted way of viewing things. IMO. Bowe took on and beat the undefeated Holyfield in 1992. In 1993, Holyfield proved he was more than just a "good small guy" but Bowe still came close to winning. Bowe was the first man to beat Holyfield, and in 1995 the first man to TKO him. These fights count for a lot, IMO. Apart from Lewis, who was definitely ducked, Holyfield was certainly better than the other heavyweights of the time. (Personally I think Holy was better than Lewis, but Lewis should have been first in line in 1993, no question.) Bowe fought Holyfield 3 times, and won twice. That's not being "steered away from dangerous fights". Sure, you can charge his manager of being over-protective at times and avoiding the toughest fights, but only up to a point. I mean, do you rate Golota as "dangerous" but the others weren't ? Gonzalez had apparently thrashed Bowe in the amateurs, and was looking quite menacing as a professional at the time. Hide had the WBO title by hospitalizing Bentt, who had blasted out Morrison. Talented guys like Donald and Tubbs are risks. Maybe taking easy defences IS "disgraceful", but Bowe wasn't the only champion to do so. And, who, apart from Lewis, was definitely ducked ? Ultimately we have to judge his accomplishments on who he beat overall in his career, and not on who he didn't fight.
Difficult to rate him imo ,he is a what might have been,good skills great infighter but flawed in character,I thought he had more potential the Lennox Lewis.
I agree with everything you said, however in regards to the third fight with Holyfield, I'm not sure exactly how dangerous Evander was still viewed as being by both the Bowe camp and the general public. This was a man who had lost to Michael Moorer, then took a leave from the sport for over a year due to a heart problem, and was around 33 or 34 years old by the time he faced Bowe in the rubber match. I'm fairly certain Riddick's people and Bowe himself were confident that Holy wouldn't be much of a threat. As it turned out though, Evander was couragious and floored him once in a competitive fight. My thoughts.
He does'nt belong Bowe fought 1 A fighter in Holyfield 1 B fighter Golota and a whole slew of C HWS And this in the second strongest HW era and the most puncher heavy division at HW of all time. Bowe loses the Holyfield trilogy and he does not get mentioned today.
Valid points, but perhaps a tad oversimplified. I certainly agree that Bowe needed to face a few more "A" level fighters to tighten up his legacy, but as it stands, his credentials and accomplishments were still fairly admirable. For one, he took two out of three against a man who commonly makes most people's top 10 list, and his only defeat was a close decision to the same man. He was never Ko'd in 44 fights, and frankly I would probably rate Coetzer, Hide, Gonzalez and Donald as "B" level fighters rather than "C". The Golata bouts hurt his legacy a bit, but I think he was declining by that point and facing a rather dirty fighter. The best contestants of the 90's outside of himself were Lewis, Holyfield, Tyson and Moorer. One of them was abscent from the scene for most of Bowe's prime. Another he beat twice, while one was Ko'd by George Foreman, and the last is probably the only note worthy fighter that he failed to meet. The Lewis match not happening was probably just as much his manager's doing as it was his own. Let me clearify that I don't rate Bowe as a top 10 man, but he still had a significant legacy worthy of great mentioning. If Ken Norton, Jerry Quarry, Joe Walcott, and Floyd Patterson, were hall of famers, then I think we can easily ad Bowe to that teir, especially considering that he may very well be a bit better than at least half of them.
Riddick Bowe I would say is slightly underrated. He had perhaps the best inside fighting skills of the big heavyweights in the last 15 years. He didn't look good both times against Andrew Golota, regardless of the low blows, but his wars with Holyfield are the most memorable. I blame Bowe, Lewis and Tyson for not getting it done against each other in the early-mid 90's, especially when Tyson returned after his exile. Boxing needed these matches and watching Bowe toss the WBC belt into the trash avoiding a fight with Lennox Lewis was not the most popular moment in his career. Lewis beat him in the olympics, which should have given Bowe incentive to avenge that loss but he didn't.
I pretty much agree on your views of their opposition outside of Patterson/Holyfield. I was gonna say that Liston was a bit lucky to catch such a relatively weak division, after all, the guys he beat were the best around, but they're on the same level as Bowe's opposition who were clearly not the best around. But let's not go off topic. Not sure if you're implying it, but i didn't and don't call Bowe a coward. The guts he showed against Golota (rematch) is incredible, his heart inside the ring is up there with anyone, literally. BUT! I think you're too easy in blaming Newman. You almost pretend asif Bowe was brainless puppet that was controlled by him. If Bowe would've wanted to fight his mandatory and be the best in the world, he could've done it and made a fortune regardless of the outcome. Newman's plan was clear: make money by fighting lesser opponents and doing that popularity tour through Africa. Bowe obliged. Yes, but i think you under-estimate the mental aspect of getting stopped by someone. Even if logic should say that Bowe/Lewis would've been close to 50/50, the mind is not logic and will try to steer you clear from the guy that humiliated you at the olympics and just scored a devastating second round knockout against a high-regarded fighter. Well he took Holyfield on because that was for the title. Hard to steer away from that if you wanna accomplish anything. But i would like to point out that at that time, Holyfield wasn't high regarded as a heavyweight at all. He was seen as great cruiserweight who was waiting to get knocked out by Mike Tyson. Many felt his power was way insufficient to deal with those bigger fighters; the struggles he had to put away Dokes, Thomas, Foreman and Holmes confirmed that for many. Douglas was fat and quit, Foreman and Holmes were old and Dokes was erratic. I know that i'm making things sound one-sidedly against Holyfield now, but this is how most people viewed it! I suggest you re-watch Holyfield-Bowe, many expected Holyfield to lose because this was the first big heavyweight in his prime that he fought. And after he did, their thoughts were confirmed, hence Newman's happiness to take a rematch. As Magoo pointed out, Holyfield was seen as washed up in their 3rd fight. In hindsight we know he still had a lot left as he showed against Tyson, but seeing how he tired/got some steroid syndrom/did too many weights, it seems to be more of a matter of Holyfield losing than Bowe winning. Especially considering Holyfield did very well early and had Bowe out on his feet in the 6th with Evander lacking the stamina to take advantage. Again, Bowe proved his heart though. Golota wasn't seen as a threat at all. He surprised the whole world with his performance. Gonzalas, Hide and Donald were good wins and you could indeed say they were threats. He didn't duck anyone besides Lewis though.