And this is how you get a 6-2 scorecard. See not a robbery but a difference of opinion. I feel the 7th was clearly a Szpilka round you feel he didn't do enough. That is a difference of opinion, which is why I don't see the controversy. Besides like another poster just pointed out who gives an eff about the score cards after the pole got ktfo!
i am polish and am a szpilka fan... gave rounds 1-3 to szpilka and rounds 4-8 to wilder.... 5-3 wilder.. and i am polish...rounds were close but wilder just landed a few snappy punches... i dunno where this robbery **** is coming from...szpilka fought awkward and well, but was losing the fight...5-3 wilder is fair...
Wilder's jab dictated the fight. If you couldn't see that then stop trying to score fights when a guy that you don't like is fighting. Blind asses...
The fight was close no matter how you look at it. I thought Arthur was slightly ahead. The judges was gonna screw Arthur no matter what he did though. A KO was the only way Haymon was gonna allow him the chance to win.
Wilders jab sucked. He had lots of trouble with Spilka's movement. The punch stats was close and it was a low output fight without much landing.
Too much of Szpilkas punches didn't land. Punch stats also show that. I was at ringside. Szpilka did well, but Wilder landed the better punches. The first two rounds could go either way. 3 and 4 was Wilder. 5 was Szpilka. 6 was Wilder. 7 was Szpilka and 8 Wilder. So it depends on the two first rounds. The crowd was very pro Szpilka and every time he tried to land, they were screaming, even though the punches were blocked.