Ridiculous "title fights"

What is the world coming to? Just look at these recent fight results recorded in boxrec. In particular, look at the records of the losing fighters. Crazy! Indecent! Unconscionable!

These were for certain titles, now what if one of those losing boxers happened to win instead?

Why isn't anyone making an issue of this? :yikes


Monday 27 August 2007 Pattaya, Chon Buri, Thailand
bantamweight Tabtimdaeng Na Rachawat 19 (15) - 1 (1) - 0 W Gun Tinular 4 (2) - 7 (4) - 0
TKO 4 12
~PABA bantamweight title ~


Saturday 25 August 2007 Museum Ludwig Forum, Aachen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
cruiserweight Stefan Raaff 4 (2) - 1 (0) - 0 W Mehmet Altintas 0 (0) - 3 (0) - 1
PTS 12 12
~ vacant Global Boxing Council Intercontinental cruiserweight title ~


Friday 24 August 2007 Jangchoong Gymnasium, Seoul, South Korea
light flyweight Joo-Hee Kim 11 (4) - 1 (1) - 1 W Yuki Sakurada 4 (0) - 7 (2) - 1 TKO 7 10~ time: 1:17 ~
~ vacant WBA Female light flyweight title ~
minimumweight Cho-Rong Son 9 (3) - 0 (0) - 0 W Lin Jin Mei (0) 1 (0) - 1 - 0 UD 10 10
~ WBA Female minimumweight title ~
flyweight Kyung-Jin Son 6 (4) - 6 (2) - 1 L Jin-Ki Jung 4 (0) - 3 (1) - 0 UD 10 10
~ vacant Korean flyweight title ~


Friday 24 August 2007 Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand
flyweight Panomroonglek Kratingdaenggym 19 (11) - 0 (0) - 0 W Lopez Dalada 0 (0) - 1 (1) - 0 TKO 6 12
~ WBC Youth flyweight title ~

 

Friend, it's not the titles I'm complaining about. It's the credentials of the fighters they allow to fight for the titles. Take a look at the losing column. Got it? :-((

 

No, I'm not. It's plain to see the losing fighters weren't qualified at all to fight for a title.

But Big Ears is probably right, those boxers' records are sometimes not complete or accurate.