Thank you for playing this out exactly as I wanted you to. You are a hypocrite with sexual hang ups regarding one specific fighter and that is your life choice.
Let's review: -Because Lomachenko's team stated they are not ready to move up two weight divisions and face Crawford, you used this terminology: " no problem acknowledging their father." "acknowledged that Crawford is daddy." -You can play ignorant all you want. You know very well that your choice of words has derogatory homosexual implications, not so much literal but it's an emasculating insult. It's no different than calling Lomachenko "Crawford's B.I.T.C.H. " -My beef with you is self explanatory in my initial post. But I will explain once more. I find it absurd that you so venomously insulted Lomachenko for something so unreasonable, and that I doubt very much you would ever use that terminology in a similar context regarding a fighter you actually like. -You immediately react as if I was questioning your sexuality and immediately start to question mine, that is an interesting reaction..but we will leave that be. That is between you and the man in the mirror. -Back to boxing. You made an interesting analogy to Mayweather, stating he fought at 154 for Oscar and Canelo but would not do the same for Golovkin. Regarding Lomachenko. Lomachenko has never fought above 130. Given Crawford fights at 140. Yet, you will state Lomachenko submitted to Crawford but refuse to use the same terminology to describe the Mayweather/Golovkin situation. And I thank you for exposing yourself as a hypocrite that doesn't really like Lomachenko.
Golovkin said he would come down to 154 only for Void, nobody else, but Void refused. Lomachenko is the most skilled boxer in the world today, and appears to be the most skilled in boxing history.........As far as Rigo? If I need a sleeping pill, I could put a video of Rigo on and go to sleep, boring as hell........
"Rigo approaching 37" ...but doesn't look a day under 47. Chin up, Rigo. Actually, keep that chin down!