Rigodeaux v.s Willie Pep

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Todd498, Jan 15, 2017.


Who wins??

  1. Pep

    62 vote(s)
    68.1%
  2. Rigodeaux

    29 vote(s)
    31.9%
  1. Enigmadanks

    Enigmadanks Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,744
    975
    Feb 5, 2009
    I get what you're saying, different eras and all.

    But Willie didn't fight in the early 1900's- he was a great FW of the 50's. Compare his style to someone like a Joe Gans who fought in the EARLY 1900's or even someone like a Benny Leonard of the 20's, and you could see those styles back than were a lot different (even their overall boxing stance looked more like fencing positions than that of boxers.) Pep's style was a more modern form; in fact he was arguably decades ahead of everyone else in the 50's when it came to technique and overall skill.
     
  2. Todd498

    Todd498 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,817
    19,075
    Jun 13, 2011
    Exactly. And I love the way we continue to beat on that little trolls corpse. Lmao

    He's already been destroyed in his argument.
     
    Rudy, Panda Danga, Mekar and 5 others like this.
  3. Todd498

    Todd498 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,817
    19,075
    Jun 13, 2011
    Bingo! :clapclap:
     
    Panda Danga, Mekar, IC3 and 6 others like this.
  4. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,148
    Dec 23, 2013
    I absolutely agree with better training and diets but more skilled i disagree. Imho boxing is timeless like baseball. If you put Ted Williams in todays game and he`d still be one of the best hitters in the game. check out this excellent vid breakdown of Peps skills i think youll appreciate it.
    This content is protected
     
    Oneirokritis, Todd498 and BigBen34 like this.
  5. BigBen34

    BigBen34 Member banned Full Member

    217
    126
    Jan 10, 2017
    Good post I agree, but in a way pep may look rudimentary versus the best of today as you pointed out the 20's fighters looked vs him
     
  6. BigBen34

    BigBen34 Member banned Full Member

    217
    126
    Jan 10, 2017
    Thanks I'll check it out :)
     
  7. vladimir radchenko

    vladimir radchenko Member banned Full Member

    154
    103
    Jan 17, 2017
    And you don't think he asked for more money? Why?
     
  8. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,341
    Feb 4, 2012
    Has he said as much?

    What we know is that he walked away from 500k minimum to go and fight Jazza for a relative pittance.

    Look if you want to say he's been avoided fine but don't be the type of hypocritical idiot who then claims he didn't swerve a fight with Lomachenko. He looked at Loma's credentials and bricked his Cuban themed trunks.
     
    Todd498 likes this.
  9. vladimir radchenko

    vladimir radchenko Member banned Full Member

    154
    103
    Jan 17, 2017
    Start at 0:22
    This content is protected
     
  10. vladimir radchenko

    vladimir radchenko Member banned Full Member

    154
    103
    Jan 17, 2017
    Lomachenko said it himself that Rigo and his people were asking for too much money.
     
  11. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,341
    Feb 4, 2012
    So some might say he priced himself out of the fight asking for money that wasn't there due to him being such a flop in the drawer sense.

    He's very entitled, moaning about not being able to get big fights and then turns down half a million dollars to fight one of the sport's elite names. He shat himself man, he was happy to take utterly crap money to fight Jazza and other journeymen in Japan whilst begging Frampton, Quigg and LSC for paydays.
     
    Todd498 likes this.
  12. vladimir radchenko

    vladimir radchenko Member banned Full Member

    154
    103
    Jan 17, 2017
    Just admit it, you're a fanboy. You can play all the cards you want but your favorite fighters ducked Rigo.
    A minute ago, you were asking why he didn't ask for more money and I just showed you a link where he did. Now you're claiming that he was pricing his way out.
    I wish more fighters had the heart of Shane Mosely back in the early 2000s when everyone was ducking Winky Wright. Shane didn't use the excuse of "he's not a draw". No, he stepped up to the plate and fought Winky when he really didn't have to.
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2017
  13. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,341
    Feb 4, 2012
    Yeah, I asked why he didn't try and negotiate. He claimed he did. Thus he didn't negotiate very well as the fight wasn't made and he had to go fight Jazza Dickens for pennies.

    The other option is that he didn't really want that fight as for once it was against someone he felt he may have been at a skill disadvantage against. He chose to earn **** money against **** opponents. That's undeniable even for you.

    And I'm not a fanboy of Loma as you claim I just see it how it is but you clearly slobber all over Rigo justifying his blatant duck whilst whining on about how he can't get the fights he wants.

    Anyway, we've clearly reached an impasse. You and about 5 other people think Rigo wanted that fight whilst the rest of the world saw him run for the hills, turning his back on a lucrative payday for peanuts.
     
  14. vladimir radchenko

    vladimir radchenko Member banned Full Member

    154
    103
    Jan 17, 2017
    Ya what whatever, you're a fanboy.
     
  15. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,341
    Feb 4, 2012
    Of course I am. *sarcastic tone* That's how you explain away your hero ducking the best fighter that wanted to face him rather than face the reality of what actually happened. You may have noticed that I didn't say Loma def beat him but rather that Rigo didn't want to know.

    Anyway keep on hugging Rigo's tiny nuts you deluded idiot. I hope that Cuban Kool-Aid tastes good.
     
    Oneirokritis, rorschach51 and Todd498 like this.