Rigondeaux Vs. Caballero, April 10?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boxing Fanatic, Feb 6, 2010.


  1. Cubanborn87

    Cubanborn87 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,124
    0
    Apr 24, 2009
    have you seen that 5 fight pro? he is the goods, 2 time olympic gold medal, one of the best amats of all time etc
     
  2. Losfer_Words

    Losfer_Words Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,385
    1
    May 30, 2009
    Paddy is usually spot-on with his info so I wouldn't doubt his source. Also, when the **** you getting back over to the Brit forum, Paddy?

    Yep, noticed that as well:good.

    It can also be argued that there are currently better fights for Rigo at 118 so I support the move to Bantam if it is what eventually pans-out. No point fighting Caballero above 122 for the sake of it, IMO. If he's going to start fighting at catchweights, he might as well abandon 122 for the time being. Exciting times ahead whatever happens next:yep:woot.
     
  3. jonnyP

    jonnyP Active Member Full Member

    1,254
    0
    Feb 4, 2010
    i have had this discussion so many times :lol: pros are pros ams are ams, i just think its too early to be saying hes going to be a world champion never mind at multi weights and be an ATG, hes exceptionally talented but far too early to tell
     
  4. ninebar

    ninebar Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,032
    0
    May 24, 2008
    :good Exactly!

    Here's a thought, How about Rigondeaux Winning the Title at 118 and having the fella in your avatar come up to face him. I'd love that.:hey

    That's 3 fantastic goals to work towards, I don't see the problem with showing some ambition to be great!