[RING, Aug. 1945] Jack Johnson picks Jeffries, Fitz, and Langford to ko Louis

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, Jul 2, 2018.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,582
    27,245
    Feb 15, 2006
    The jab is as old as the port of boxing!
     
    BitPlayerVesti likes this.
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,738
    29,090
    Jun 2, 2006
    Did he?The only one I know he picked was Schmeling and he got that one right! Who else did he pick to beat Joe?

    Johnson picked Louis to stop Carnera.
    Jack Hurley picked just about everyone to beat Louis including Carnera and M Baer.
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,582
    27,245
    Feb 15, 2006
    It might just be a case of a broken clock being right twice a day.

    If he picked everybody to beat Louis, then he was bound to pick the man who eventually did, but the salient point is all the times that he got it spectacularly wrong.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,738
    29,090
    Jun 2, 2006
    Please can you name all these Johnson picked to beat Louis?
     
  5. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    We'll have to agree to disagree. I just haven't seen much to suggest that Johnson would deal well with a bigger mobile opponent who consistently kept distance while pumping his jab and firing off punches from distance.
     
  6. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Sure, but the strategy and tactics that heavyweights use to control fights with their jabs aren't. Bigger fighters eventually got a lot better at that, thanks in large part to Ali (imo).
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,582
    27,245
    Feb 15, 2006
    Not off the top of my head, but I don't think that he picked Louis over anybody who had held the title, after it became apparent that they would never work together.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,738
    29,090
    Jun 2, 2006
    I know he picked Louis over Baer and Carnera! Can you find your source?
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  9. louis54

    louis54 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,187
    1,302
    Mar 20, 2013
    Thanks a gain mr. K ...interesting articles !!!!!
    i imagine Johnson taking of long distance bouts
    15 rounds louis and Dempsey murders all save Johnson imo
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  10. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    There's manuels from the 1800's that say you should constantly move to the side and the jab is the most common punch.

    I think some of the earlier boxing (such as 1700's) was more offensively focused however and there doesn't seem much jabbing and moving.
     
  11. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    No problem! It's a shame all of these articles aren't already online.
     
    louis54 likes this.
  12. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    What would you like to bet, Mr. Welcher? I know its out there on video and quoted Dempsey's own words.

    Your track record for calling me is out not a good one!

    Better yet, once I prove it to you, how will you change?
     
  13. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Which times did he get it spectacularly wrong?
     
  14. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    I have seen Johnson's put downs of Louis quite often in the past.

    For me, the most interesting feature is his high rating of Hank Griffin. It makes sense, as Johnson struggled with Griffin. Although he claims he got the better of Griffin in several fights he mentions, there seems to be no record of any of that. Griffin beat Johnson once, and drew with him twice, according to box rec.

    There is no record of the 65 round KO. I am skeptical. It seems to me very odd that Johnson didn't mention the 65 round fight in 1909, but did in 1945. Griffin was still alive in 1909 and could have come forward to contradict him. By 1945 Griffin was long dead. I also wonder if the "referee" mentioned was still alive.

    Johnson is not alone in focusing on Griffin. Tad Dorgan wrote this in the lead up to the Jeffries fight in 1910.

    "You know Johnson hasn't shown a lot of class in his fights. He had little fellows to fight, such as Burns and Ketchel. What about a big fellow with a punch? Hank Griffin hit Johnson on the chops in the second round of their fifteen round fight and Johnson did nothing but play safe after that."

    I think it is a pertinent point made on this thread that a defensive style such as that of Johnson, or of Tunney, works a lot better if you are the taller and rangier fighter. If the other guy has the reach to get to you with jabs or rights over a jab it creates a different dynamic.
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2018
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,738
    29,090
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'm a welcher?We had a bet Fitz v Ruhlin fight was filmed.
    I said it wasn't you said it was. I proved it wasn't with quotes from;Gilbert Odd, Adam Pollack,Ted Spoon,you said Ted Spoon had said the fight was filmed,I e mailed him and he denied ever saying such a thing and said he was surprised you would say it. , and Klompton also confirmed it was not filmed.

    Here is an extract from Odd's Fitzsimmons biography referring to this fight.
    "It had been intended to take a cinematograph version of the fight but because of a technical breakdown nothing materialized.It was therefore proposed that the two men should go through the motions so that a fake film could be made"pages 180 &181.
    I also proved that because it wasn't filmed a re-enactment took place some weeks later.
    Odd deals thoroughly with it in his book on Fitzsimmons,,he talks about Ruhlin being so badly marked up they had to apply stage greasepaint make up to cover his bruises and lacerations.
    Odd also goes into detail about the fact that Jim Corbett was Ruhlin's second and the fact that after fight ,which was held in the orginal MadisonSquare Garden NY Corbett travelled home to
    San Francisco and refused to travel back for the re-enacted film.
    The fake film was made by E Lubin a well known film re-enactor and con man , and passed off as the real thing until a spectator noticed that Corbett whio had been a very vocal presence in Ruhlin's corner was not in the film.
    The crowd then shouted fake and demanded their money back.
    All this in is Odd's ,"The Fighting Blacksmith."
    You reneged on the bet and refused to pay up.
    Now you have the bare-faced gall to call me a welcher!
    Q WAS THE ACTUAL FIGHT FILMED? A.NO!!!!!
    And people wonder why I despise you?
    You are a miserable excuse for a human being ,a liar, a bet welcher, a bigoted racist, and a physical coward.
    It has been my very great pleasure to expose you on many occasions and I look forward to continuing to do so.
     
    Tonto62 likes this.