Ring HW Rankings: Tyson Fury Has ZERO Wins Over Current Top Ten HWs

Anyone who is trying to drag Joshua’s resume down to the mud next to Fury’s is just trolling.

Joshua has twice as many title fights as Fury, despite starting his career later. He also beat everyone who is anyone in Fury’s career either earlier or in a more emphatic fashion. Fury couldn’t hurt Ngannou, Wallin or Klitschko, Joshua went on to KO them all. Fury ducked a still unbeaten Whyte, Joshua took his 0.

Joshua’s resume and attitude towards building a legacy is in another dimension compared to that of Fury. Quite telling that only Fury's remaining handful of trolling fans try to argue otherwise because no, I don’t even like Joshua one bit.

 

Chisora wasn't top 10 in Ring for sure. So the entire post is a lie and trying to save face. And why 3 years?? When that number has become epitome for comparison??? Why not 2 or 5 or the entire career ???
AJ resume shyte all over Fury and its not even close. AJ is about to fight Dubois and is going miles ahead of Fury as well.

 

Nice trolling as usual showing your Fury bias and AJ hate. AJ already KO Joyce in 1 round in the amateurs, already beaten Zhang in the amateurs as well, already beat Parker with ease, and going to do it again and most likely going to fight Dubois in September which going to be announced next week
And Fury resume is still going to be garbage.

 

Even though Ring magazine's ratings are better than those of sanctioning bodies, their bias towards Fury and certain other fighters is apparent.

 

What kind of bias towards Fury?

 

Wilder 3 is three years ago this October. It all seems so long ago

 

Wow. Usyk beats all these guys in top 10. True champion.

 

The fact you have to go back to AJ's fight with Parker to get his top 10 is pretty funny.
Do you know how many years ago that was?

AJ has literally ducked Wilder, Joyce, Zhang and Fury from that list, LOL. All in the last couple of years. And we can name the exact opponents he chose instead.

 

[url]Lol.[/url]

 

Yeah my bad, but still why he chooses a specific 3 years??? To make Fury look better??? I don't like Fury and i don't hide it, but that's all on Fury. He choose to be talker, instead of proving things in the ring. He talk a big game, but failed to deliver.
So many good fights we won't see because of him. He wasted everyone time and career as well. His own as too.
He already could have ATG resume even with few loses on his record. He was still very young when he returned to boxing after the ban.
And had 3 meaningful fights. Wilder, Whyte and Usyk.
Wasted good 2 years of Usyk career ducking him, a good year of AJ as well.
We won't ever seen him with the likes of Joyce, Zhang, Dubois, Hrgovic, Anderson, Parker, etc., and I'm sure he won't fight AJ as well.
This thread speaks volumes. Just showing how little top 10 fighters Fury truly have in his career.

 

I'm just responding to your post where you mentioned all these fighters Fury should have been fighting, and pointing out that AJ hasn't fought them either. You can't have it both ways mate.

 

The fact you have to mention AJ once fought someone in the amateurs to defend his professional career is the definition of bias.

Sure he has a win over Parker. It's arguably the best win on his resume, but that was about 8 years ago.

I'm not even defending Fury here, just pointing out the inconsistency and hypocrisy people like you have when it comes to AJ. Fury should have been taking better fights in the past couple of years (he gets some credit for finally facing Usyk), so should AJ.

 

At least you've finally admitted your bias. Well done.