ring mag: Pac vs the ATGs at Featherweight...

I have this copy. Why they didn't match him with chavez??? Is Chavez not Great enough???

 

Chavez won no titles at FW....you are thinking SFW.

 

Pacdbest, you just showed your lack of boxing knowlege.....read a book....Chavez didnt hangout at featherweight!...he had a few fights at 130, then moved to 135 and on and on...

write that down!

 

These the one article that Proves Pac is already an All time Greats. Compared to the Greats is already a Great Honor. Did the Ring made an Article like these to any Modern HOFamers like MAB, EM, Chavez or PBF???

 

Are you saying that if they didn't make an article about Chavez that he is NOT an ATG?

All it proves is that they feel he has legitimate shots against ATG based on styles. Beating an ATG doesn't make you an ATG. That's based on accomplishments. Pacman has some things to do first.

 

I knew that. I'm just Playing with you guys. Just Creating a Spark.:yep

 

Pac has done enough & will do more.

 

He has not done enough to be an ATG in my book. Don't care whether you agree or not anymore than you care if I agree with you or not.

 

Pac is an ATG because he makes the 2 other modern Great look like a shot fighter. He earned it in the ring. The Ring Article just back it up.

 

Well you're not Legit anyway. The Ring is Legit & more Credible than you.

 

Over the years they've done articles like that fighters, such as Lewis, Tyson, and De La Hoya.

 

Ring is more legit than you too. If this is your stance, then no more "Pacman is really p4p #1" crap from you. According to Ring, who you consider legit, he isn't. :deal

PS. I am certainly more legit than you. Why don't you send Ring your views and see how legit they think you are:bbb
I don't pick bouts based on nationality.

 

Remember this post next time you and your buddies wanna know why you get bashed all the time. There was no need to bring up those fighters and try to move Pacman ahead of them with your sarcasm.