ring mag: Pac vs the ATGs at Featherweight...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Illmatic, Aug 7, 2007.


  1. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    No, he is not an ATG just cuz he came from 106. You can't have it both ways. I am not counting his losses there against good but not great fighters as much because that was not his natural weight. Isn't that the reason you guys say he lost?

    If it wasn't his natural weight and is the excuse for his losses, then NO, he gets no credit for coming up from that weight and fighting larger fighters cuz according to you guys, he wasn't naturally that weight.

    He is not an ATG yet in my book.
     
  2. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Pay attention.....FW is 126, not 130. Chavez did more at 130 than Pacman has.
     
  3. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    I know, but I was taking a **** and looking through the pack of ring mags next to the toilet and thought this might interest some people
     
  4. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Uh uh....they deserve all they get. Domngo jumped into the Polish Express thread and caused a fight just to do so.
     
  5. johnco

    johnco Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,598
    0
    May 9, 2006
    you made me laugh everytime you showed your stupidity in this forum. :lol::lol:

    first of all, em won on the first fight. true. not controversial, nothing special. you dont brag when someone won courtesy of someone who couldnt see :lol::lol: COMMON SENSE please :-( and that excuse of pac was proven NOT ONLY ONCE BUT TWICE :good
    jmm was a difficult to explain because alot of you guys are jumping like morons when he got the GIFTED DRAW. going to that fight, pac busted his left hand after the first round with blisters on his sole. YES IT IS AN EXCUSE and when pac was asked for a rematched he said "yes" but when jmm was asked if he also likes to rematch, he said " i will talk to nacho" :lol::lol:
    see... he so scared he knows he got a gift and doesnt want to **** his pants again. he got malaria instead. well he also chickened out from guzman :good

    AND PLEASE you have to stick this in your pea brain sweet pea that MAB, JMM, EM kissed the canvass many many times courtesy of a 1-d man who came from 106 :good IT IS MIND BOGGLING ISNT IT? :hey SO IF YOU STILL THINK PAC IS NOTHING, then sweet pea i cant help you witht that brain of yours :lol::lol:

    and if pac loses someday, i am sport. ill give what is due. it is just our time and we have the bragging rights.... not a stupid fan who doesnt have the BRAGGING RIGHTS. you know DEFINITELY KNOW WHO THEY ARE :good
     
  6. johnco

    johnco Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,598
    0
    May 9, 2006
    you know the meaning of " EVEN AT" ??? :patsch:patsch :lol::lol:
    pac is number 2 pound per pound at 130.... by the ring mag :good
    who did chavez beat at 130 with a pound per pound rating of 1 or 2?
    :bart
     
  7. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Pacman isn't #2 based on his wins at 130. He is based on his wins overall and people in front of him losing (remember Hopkins).

    Do YOU know the meaning of "even at"? You quoted the part that says he didn't hang out at FW, as though it justified something that may or may not happen at 130. You tell ME what the hell that meant.

    And Chavez defended his SFW belt 9 times or so. How many has Pacman defended his? Things stay in context....i don't deal with analogies that work in vacuums.
     
  8. johnco

    johnco Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,598
    0
    May 9, 2006
     
  9. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Pea once they start biting at your ankles just **** on there head.
     
  10. Motor City Sam

    Motor City Sam Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,102
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    Too much information, Illmatic. :lol:
     
  11. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl


    sad thing is this is all to true:yep :yep :yep
     
  12. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Pac all by KO.
     
  13. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    dude. you never had a different answer. can you at least tell us all how and why pac ko's them all? this makes you look stupid

    larrios ain't worth **** if compared to those greats mentioned and still he managed to get a decision against pac. and don't start with the pad did that to please the fans in the philippines type of ****. the people who watched that would have went home happier if pac ktfo larrios in the 1st round.

    anyway, i agree wtih most of those match ups at 126 but if it's at 130, pac will have 2 or 3 more victories then those mentioned
     
  14. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    For the most part, I agree with them on the matchups
     
  15. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    i don't read potter so i don't know who snape is but if he resembles anything like me, he is good shape. :D . just kidding bro.

    it's good that you can't quite figure me out. i like that side of me:good