ring mag: Pac vs the ATGs at Featherweight...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Illmatic, Aug 7, 2007.


  1. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006

    hehehe.. that was my point long before.. its easy to excite the huggers with match ups like that. Thats why i hate it when people do these mythical pairings, (maybe they're expecting professional analysis), because it always ends up as forum trashing. The fighter then ends up being the loser because instead of gaining fans, they get bashed because of their die hard fans. And then the opportunistic haters comes in...don't take it seriously i suggest, cause its really something to laugh about if your just an observer.:yep
     
  2. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    dude, you just edited your post as shown beneath in as "edited by PATSYS". the only difference between what i quoted from what your message is now is that you changed "month" to "weeks". so if you didn't make a mistake, what the hell did you edit?

    you're pathetic. and so are all of you're pac by ko ****. you're a loser who can only back his statements by saying that pac has inhumane everything. you can't even back it up with real arguements. i reckon that you don't even recognize the names that were matched up against pac.

    the only thing in your pathetic little life that you can be proud of is pac and you'll probably kill yourself if pac loses again.

    it was a simple mistake and you could have got yourself off the hook if you just admitted it.
     
  3. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    You're very wrong. :tong
     
  4. Morrissey

    Morrissey Underrated Full Member

    6,322
    3
    Jun 24, 2006
    I think Patsys is just cracking you up guys.

    He has been saying that phrase since time immemorial.

    Nothing to worry about.:yep
     
  5. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,441
    Jun 30, 2005
    Pacquiao by TKO as long as he has the right socks and gloves. He is invincible with the puncher's gloves and expensive well made sporting socks.

    He'd beat all of them and a paternity suit on the same day, then beat everyone in the pool hall at 8 ball, and outsing everyone on the Karaoke.
     
  6. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    On esb PAC is way underrated by most people. In general though i think his rating is pretty well established
     
  7. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Completely disagree. I think people that overrate him state that he is underrated here. On what grounds is he underrated on ESB? By comparison to other fighters?
     
  8. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    --


    Pacman isn't an ATG yet, he needs some more solid wins: more quantity of wins over ranked contenders of his era. He has the ability of an All Time Great, though.

    He has been successful climbing up weight classes, but hasn't dominated any yet. He doesn't have dominance and longevity in any weight class. I think he can achieve that at Jr. Lightweight.
     
  9. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    How can some people say that Pacman is an ATG at Featherweight? :rofl

    It's ok to compare him to ATGs, and he may win fights over past ATGs, but that doesn't mean that he is right now an ATG. ****, Wlad could beat Ezzard Charles and Jim Jeffries, but it doesn't mean he is as great as Charles or Jeffries.

    Pac was in the Featherweight division for only 2 years. He had a great win over Barrera, but then also wins over Yeshmaganbetov (?), Emmanuel Lucero, 3K Battery and a draw against JM Marquez. Just because a win over Barrera you can't rank Pacquiao high at Featherweight. No way.

    As I said, Pac hasn't been really a dominant champ in any weight class yet. He doesn't have a reign like Duran at Lightweight, like Lewis at Heavyweight, like Armstrong at Welterweight; not even like Tszyu at Light Welterweight; not even like Mayweather at Jr. Lightweight.
     
  10. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    For me, the standard at Super Feather/Jr Light is set by 2 fighters. Arguello and Mayweather. No one has reached this standard yet. Pacman has the potential. But fighting MAB is not the way to get there. Remember, Pacman has yet to face a champion in this weight class. He certainly can beat them.....
     
  11. Guru_Too_You

    Guru_Too_You ESB OG circa '99 Full Member

    3,217
    0
    Jul 24, 2004
    Shoulda just thrown that one IN the toilet.
     
  12. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    ledwaba (superbantam) and sasakul (flyweight) were certainly elite when pac ko'd them. but we're talking about featherweight here...
     
  13. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    so he was lucky? that's all? stupid post
     
  14. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    fortunate=lucky. you're more stupid than i initially thought
     
  15. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    Main Entry: lucky
    Pronunciation: 'l&-kE
    Function: adjective
    Inflected Form(s): luck·i·er; -est
    1 : having good luck
    2 : happening by chance : FORTUITOUS
    3 : producing or resulting in good by chance : FAVORABLE
    4 : seeming to bring good luck <a lucky rabbit's foot>
    - luck&#183;i&#183;ness /'l&-kE-n&s/ noun
    synonyms LUCKY, FORTUNATE, HAPPY, PROVIDENTIAL mean meeting with unforeseen success. LUCKY stresses the agency of chance in bringing about a favorable result <won because of a lucky bounce>. FORTUNATE suggests being rewarded beyond one's deserts <fortunate in my investments>. HAPPY combines the implications of LUCKY and FORTUNATE with stress on being blessed <a series of happy accidents>. PROVIDENTIAL more definitely implies the help or intervention of a higher power <a providential change in the weather>.

    http://merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lucky