Ring Mag: Pacquiao is the greatest fighter of the decade

NO he's actually right, he just didn't explain the details:

The decade starts at Midnight on the 31 Dec 1999.

It ends at Midnight on the 31 Dec 2009.

The 20th century started at midnight on the 31 Dec 1899
It ended at midnight on the 31 Dec 1999.

 

Yes.

 

Best fighter of the decade lost at least 18 of out 24 rounds against Marquez ?

Best fighter of the decade lost to the prime version of his best opponent (Morales); living off 2 shot wins ?

Best fighter of the decade knocked down by a jab against Hussein ?

Best fighter of the decade KO'd twice against nobodies ?



Nah, Pac deserves it after his fight with Hatton, along with Hopkins and Mayweather its a close call.

 

You forgot about the bet?

 

the bet mate, i think you're forgetting it?

or you're not man enough to honor it?

 

Pac was best of the decade before he ever fought Oscar

 

hey estupido, you forgettin the bet and what you've pledged to not do for a certain agreed period? :hey

 

Last 3 fights

Diaz= Not even an elite fighter

ODH= Dead man walking (Badly weight drained)

Hatton= Walked right on to the shots, with no defence or headmovement.


Good wins but this is an over reaction from the RING.


Mayweather Jr best fighter of this decade.

Mayweather Jr would KO Manny. Manny is hittable, and Mayweather's power is underrated. Still we dont know how would Manny chin/body will hold up vs a live top higher weight fighter?, Mayweather would make his size and power count.

 

How about you compare all of Pac's fights since 2001 to PBF's fights since 2001.

 

O.K answer this, since 2001 until Mayweather Jr retired who was ranked No.1 P4P longer?

 

:thumbsup

 

No, he didn't. You can't score a fight.

Morales wasn't shot in the 2nd fight, that's why he fought like a lion for 10 brutally violent rounds. By the 3rd fight, the physical and mental effects of being legitimately floored for the first time and stopped for the first time by a faster, more powerful, more determined opponent had taken their toll, hence the reason he was not able to fight for 10 violent rounds that time.

Such a dumbass comment. I'm embarrassed for you. Pacquiao got up and won that fight you twisted inbred. James Toney was floored by a jab from Sam Peter, are you going to call his chin and resilience into question too? Pacquiao has proved against Barrera, Morales, Marquez, Hatton, countless others this decade that he has an excellent chin. Surely you cannot deny this if you think Marquez won 18 out of 24 rounds?? Marquez is a known KO puncher, and he didn't drop Pacquiao once. If he was beating him for 18 rounds out of 24, isn't that cast-iron evidence of a very solid chin? You don't have a clue.

The fact that you call Singsurat a nobody just proves what an ignorant part-time fan ****face you really are. And FYI, those 2 defeats were in 1996 and 1999, so they are completely irrelevant in discussing who has been Fighter Of The Decade.

If you had a brain, you'd be embarrassed by your post.

Pacquiao 1st, Hopkins 2nd, Mayweather 3rd :good

PBF simply hasn't fought the comp to be in serious contention at this stage.

 

No it does not. You are contemplating that there is a year 0 when there is none. Whether you like it or not, the 20th century started on January 1, 2001 just as the first century started in January 1, 0001.

 

Then why was Chavez-Taylor voted fight of the 90s when it happened in 1990 & Morales-Barrera I wasnt even considered because it happened in the yr 2000 ?

Answer - JCC-Taylor was in the decade of the 90s & EM-MAB I was in the decade of 2000s.