ring magazine p4p list.

That's actually not a bad list

 

The usual crappy ring mag P4P list. How can Hatton and Hopkins even be on the list? What about Rafael? This is disgusting. How come JC and Cotto aren't higher up?

 

so because hatton gets beat by the p4p 1 he drops off the list,i doubt it!
calzaghe should be above hopkins and jmm is too high while i dont know if pavlik should be no 10,i dont have a big problem with it though.

 

Whom has Hatton beat since Tzsyu? Furthermore he has been anything but impressive for a long time. Klitschko should have his place instead.

 

atsch...examine the term pound for pound and then look up klitschkos weight.

YOu think a 250 lb version of any of those top 10 fighters wouldnt stomp the living **** out of Wlad?

A 250 lbs version of Mayorga would beat Wlad.

 

i got no problem with the ratings

 

acutally a good list...u just dont know ne thing bout boxing..loser...

 

to think, all it took was for wright to not have a quality win for about 3 years to get him off the list

 

So by default you say that a HW can't be considered in the P4P list?

The rest you are saying is stupidity without end, and deserves no response.

 

lol, at least I know how to spell. I have watched boxing for more years than you have lived.

 

Hatton in a p4p list is a joke

 

mate,thats a **** comeback,thing is,hatton kept on winning and looked mighty good doing it against castillo,to say he doesnt deserve to be on the list is a bit harsh.
cotto needs that breakthrough win to really fly up the rankings,the mosley fight wasnt it because mosley was old and it was a rather tight fight.pavlik hasnt beat a p4p fighter and technically isnt all that good.
but really though,its a surprisingly good list and if we wanted we could pick holes about any fighter on it.

 

just about the right list, marquez still gets 3rd even though he lose because the a lot of people felt he won. I probably have the same kind of list

 

:huh

:huh