ring magazine p4p list.

The dude had nothing to offer other than bs, so he got what he deserved.

I like Hatton, but that is not the same as to say that he currently deserves his Top10 spot. Though the win vs Castillo was a good one, it also showed that Castillo has been in too many wars to be considered as good a win, as it would 5 years ago.

If you believe in the Ring p4p list, then Taylor was no. 10 or so. He has been higher without losing, simply because he lost popularity; which is a good reflection of this Rings list, or else they suddenly realized that Taylor was no good. However, I think Pavliks spot is okay, as Taylor is only a decent fighter.

Cotto has beaten Quintana, Torres, Malinaggi, Zab Judah and Mosley, and one has to be blind not to rank him in top 5.

 

find where i said that dumbass.

'88 Tyson= dominant, great wins, low weight, #1 p4p

 

i understand where you're coming from mate,but cotto has never fought the man in his division like hatton did,ok that was close to 3 years ago,but he's only been beaten once since then in 5 fights all against decent opposition.i dont want to get too far into it because its been done too much but do you honestly think cotto deserves a higher placing than calzaghe,pacman?personally i have cotto number 5-6,i have him higher than hopkins,but he really does need that defining fight imo.