I'm not sure who will win. I lean towards JMM, but, I could see it going either way. What I am sure of is that I am betting on JMM. (in fact I already did) +150 for an even fight is a good bet. And I think the odds will come down prior to the fight to around even with a slight lean towards Pac.
The analysis I promised earlier to Divac and a few others, since I rarely make more than a broad overview (which is usually correct), unlike some others who make a more detailed breakdown and remind us of it every chance they get if they are correct. Point is, I won't be surprised at how old JMM looks. I already saw signs of that. On top of this, I have seen the same signs in Pacquiao, to a lesser degree, and in areas where he can hide it because he was so substantial there to begin with.
This is a simple equation. A hungry PAC against a slower JMM. Dont expect to see a Solis and MAB II version.
I want to hear from the haters if they consider JMM old and out of his prime before the fight happens. I don't want to hear any of these bullshits after JMM loses. I want to hear it now. :yep
JMM is still prime not peak but still dangerous so there isnt any excuse available.....but PAC is going to be an animal for this fight
I don't believe either fighter is prime. I do think that effects JMM more than it effects Pacquiao though..... Also, I don't think someone is a hater for calling JMM old. 35 IS old in most major sports.
I was thinking the same thing. To answer the author on: ''Ring Magazine picks Marquez over Pac'' my answer is duuhhhh
it's funny that the article did not even mention that ring is now under gbp ergo won't pick pac because they ahte him for not signing up with them. i think this works adversely for jmm because it will inspire pac. like the people who said he won't have a chance against mab in their first fight