***Ring Magazine pound for pound [latest rankings]***

Not a bad list

 

So be it . . . that's their list.

For the people who'll complain as IF their own list is more credible than Ring's . . . have your own list be published and be recognized. :hey

:rofl :rofl

 

ok can still someone care to explain why hopkins is WBO superchamp?atsch

 

How many of the Top Ten have direct or indirect connections
with Golden Boy Productions?

Not a complaint.....just a question.

 

That's not a bad list at all. Here's what I'd change if it were me, though:

1)Pac
2)Calzaghe
3)Izzy
4)JMM
5)Cotto
6)Pavlik
7)Mijares
8)Rafa
9)Klitschko
10)tie between Haye and Calderon - this is basically a coin flip for me.

 

I guess Ring Magazine had him ranked at #11 after his subpar performance against Lazcano but now that Floyd's "gone," I guess he now moves back into the top 10.

 

Why the ****'s Marquez number 3! That should be Cotto. Ricky shouldn't even be on it after being knocked out by a ring post.

 

No way, why'll I do love Marquez. He would win more convincingly if Pac wasn't knocking his ass down every fight.

 

Agree, what's with the loosing guys on the record. In that case put Hoya, Mosley, and Trinidad back on there too.

 

1. Pacquiao
2. Calzaghe
3. Cotto
4. Marquez
5. Pavlik
6. Vasquez

 

Hopkins should sink a lot more to the bottom

 

I second this one. good list. :good

 

No Winky but Hatton?

Other than that, I agree... I never had Mijares on because I felt to get there he needs at least to be the best at his division but today there are 2 equally good fighter based on resume: Cristian and Fernando Montiel... but now the top10 spot is good for him...

I agree with the list but I have Calzaghe on the top.

 

ok, no one here knows how did hopkins gets to be WBO superchamp then?

 

actually, i think it's more of no one cares whatever the abc orgs call anybody.