Ring Magazine Ranks - The top 10 Fighters of the Decade in each division-

clearly mab is the best of the 3 at that weight (best wins). pac should be at 3. and no way pac is #3 at WW. i'll even rate cotto higher than him.

 

:good He just didn't get enough work done, and Marquez didn't beat the competition Marco did.

 

On a quick look the lists are terrible in that there are some glaringly obvious problems with them. Thanks for posting them, though.

 

I think its funny that Povetikin makes the list and L
amon Brewster didnt!

 

I'm glad to see Oscar Larios at #3 in the Junior Featherweight (122 lbs.) division. He may or may not deserve that high of a ranking to some of you, but at least the Ring recognizes his accomplishments.

Pac should not be in the top 10 at Junior Welterweight (140 lbs.) having fought only once against Ricky Hatton, nor should he be ranked in the top 10 at Welterweight (147 lbs.) having fought only twice (De La Hoya and Cotto) eventhough he won all his fights and they were all big fights. Just too little work before the decade was up.

 

Lists suck. Who ever made this feeds on PAC seeds.
No zab at 147?
Cotto should be 1.at welter. He fought everybody and never took an easy night and only lost to cheaters. But Paul Williams ducked by every fighter on the welter list. He's the best by default....
Kelly pav title rein is an insult to the crown.

 

There`s so much wrong Im not even going to go into it.

Thats all !

 

The `Ring` are biased *******s that know **** all, I dont respect anything that comes from them, they should be outlawed.

 

Dude.... you're on a roll.

 

JR WELTER
1 - Tszyu
2 - Hatton
3 - Cotto
4 - Pac
5 - Judah
6 - Bradley
7 - Mayweather
8 - Witter
9 - Sharmba
10 - Gatti

Kirk out of your entire list the only issue I felt strongly about was that you rank Pac so high at 140 considering he only had one fight at this weight. I would place him lower. Its hard to make a case to rank him so high on the list even though he effectively dominated the best fighter at that weight. He would need at least another win at 140 against another elite fighter to make the case to rank him that high.

 

Ring Magazine all-time and decade rankings have always been a joke........most of the time its one person's opinion and he sets the ranking all by himself.

Had this been a ranking of fighters based on a group of select boxing journalist, the lists would be more credible, but they're usually not.......


The person ranking did get featherweight correct.
The featherweight of the era is at the top!good