Ring Magazine Subscription Cancellation

I'm not a fan of self-righteous threads, but I'm starting one this time, because having Adrien Broner at 5 pound for pound (and Guerrero at 10 if I'm feeling nit-picky) is ridiculous.

I'm calling "horse-****" and cancelling my Ring subscription, and I encourage you to do the same.

It was once a respected magazine seen as the voice of boxing, but is gradually becoming mere vehicle of propaganda for a certain promotion company.

It won't make any kind of difference unless many people do it, and there are worse things in the world, but **** it, I care so I'm doing it.

 

......yeah. I'm just gonna ***** like a little girl. Thanks for the tip though :good

 

Yeah, but unlike ours, the Ring magazine's is a traditional and well respected opinion.

Do you have Broner at 5? If not, why do you think a Golden Boy owned magazine does? Work it out.

 

Name Broner's top three wins.

Edit: And please don't tell me you do P4P based on potential. That's more bull****.

 

Atrocious post. Money talks...so you agree with a promoter subtly influencing a magazine with huge tradition within the sport?

Of course he is a special talent. His win over DeMarco was superb. That is not enough to put him past Donaire, who has beaten Montiel and Darchinyan (who were both at the time top 10 pound for pound according to The Ring themselves!)

Other than that, Escobedo and Perez? You have to be ****ing shitting me.

Nope. No he wouldn't. Can you tell me how you worked that one out, is it based on previous examples of British fighters being over-rated in the Ring's P4P lists or.....? Because it has to be said, Carl Froch has impressively beaten Bute, Pascal, Taylor and Abraham and he's nowhere to be seen. Ricky Burns has Roman Martinez, Katsidis, Mitchell and Moses and he's nowhere to be seen.

See you, clown.