Rigondeaux is olympic gold medalist, has more talent in his one hand than Broner all together, is also a champion bla bla bla. You daft mofo :rofl
:good I actually quite like Broner's style (in the ring). I just do not think he warrants a top ten ranking, even if this list is entirely subjective, I also find it hard to believe its simply coincidence Broner is also managed by Al Haymon.
This is the same magazine that had Pacman and Floyd joint number 1 for ages when anyone who knows their boxing had Floyd above him. If we're taking 'potential' into account why is Rigo not on there? And Bradley and no Froch, please...
I dont understand why anyone would pay for it. Better info, articles and pics on the net. The info is a few months old.
Mares, Froch and Vilorias' resume and recent victories **** all over Broner's, why are they nowhere to be seen in the P4P list? Oh yeah, because they commited the sin of being not american, or not signed to GBP, or a combination of said factors
Yeah, there's a few reasons not to buy. This just tops it off to be honest. I agree. Guerrero has a better case for top ten ranking than Broner. Pretty much nailed it.
But genuinely, are you going to continue to buy? Your not at all suspect of Broner's rating? You don't mind the fact they got rid of Dr Margaret Goodman and her column because she is with that pesky drug testing body - VADA? You know what, keep buying gents. Morons belong together.