Ring Magazine web article on modern super heavies.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, May 29, 2009.


  1. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Heavyweights have become super sized


    By Michael Rosenthal


    [url]
    This content is protected
    [/url]In the 1910s and ’20s, Jack Dempsey was considered a big man. He was 6 feet 1 inch and no more than 200 pounds during his fighting career.

    Behemoths like 6-6½ Jess Willard, who Dempsey knocked out in 1919 to win the heavyweight championship, and 6-5½ Primo Carnera about two decades later were considered freaks, lumbering giants with minimal ability.

    Now? Big is in.

    Consider our heavyweight titleholders: Wladimir Klitschko, 6-6½, 245; Vitali Klitschko, 6-7½, 250; and Nikolai Valuev, 7-0, over 300. David Haye, who faces Wladimir Klitschko on June 20, is the same size as Muhammad Ali (6-3, around 215) yet he’s considered small.

    The experts suspect this is part of a universal trend toward bigger, stronger athletes in all sports, they believe the giants are very difficult to beat and they anticipate a day when a “super heavyweight” division is standard in boxing.

    One person who knows is Chris Byrd, a small heavyweight who fought both Klitschkos and 6-6 Jameel McCline.

    “These guys are huge,” he said. “Back in the day, you didn’t see any really big heavyweights like this. You were big if you weighed 220-225. George Foreman was considered big and he weighed only around 225. Now, they get up to 7 feet and 300 pounds. And the really big guys we did have back then weren’t very talented. Now, they’re coordinated, talented guys with power, height and reach.

    “It’s almost an impossible task for a smaller heavyweight to compete with them. These guys are getting bigger and better.”

    Former heavyweight titleholder Michael Moorer, 6-2, 220-225 at his best, pointed out that the giants mentioned above –- plus 6-7 contender Alexander Dimitrenko –- are all from former Soviet states and wonders “what they feed their children over there.”

    Most likely, athletes over there are getting bigger naturally. Here, too. Byrd said his father, who runs a busy gym in Flint, Mich., told him recently that he’s astonished at how big the children in his program have become.

    The problem in the United States, several observers suggested, is that the most-athletic giants are playing defensive end in the NFL or power forward in the NBA.

    Byrd knows imposing 6-11, 265-pound Orlando Magic center Dwight Howard, who dabbles in boxing in his spare time. The fighter had Howard hit the mitts one day in the gym and couldn’t believe what he experienced.

    “I was like, ‘Mannnnnnn,’” Byrd said. “He had an amazing right hand; he punched right through the mitt. I told him, ‘If anyone squares off with you on the court, you’re gonna go to prison. You’re gonna kill somebody.’ He has a perfect right hand; he knows how to throw it.

    “If he had started as a boxer or even if he were converted, man, I think he could be something.”

    Howard is busy, though. That leaves us with the giants from the former Soviet Union who are nowhere near as athletic as many of the NBA stars but are effective in the ring.

    As Byrd will tell you, the Klitschkos and Co. are immensely strong, have solid fundamentals, know how to use their height, train extremely hard and are more coordinated than people realize.

    They have been beaten. For example, Wladimir Klitschko has been knocked out three times by marginal heavyweights, raising lingering questions about his chin. And Valuev was outboxed by 6-1 Ruslan Chagaev even though he gave up more than 90 pounds, proving that size can be overcome with ability. Valuev and Chagaev meet again Saturday.

    Byrd, who went 2-2 against the Klitschkos and McCline, said the best strategy to beat an extremely large man is to get him to go backward. He said Wladimir Klitschko, in particular, cannot fight on his heels. However, it’s next to impossible to move King Kong.

    “I fully expect the next heavyweight champion to climb the Empire State Building,” historian Bert Sugar said.

    Indeed, it’s the big men who almost always use their strength to move opponents backward and then impose their will. They’ve found a formula to win consistently –- albeit against a weak pool of heavyweights.

    The Klitschkos, Valuev and Dimitrenko are a combined 168-6, with 135 knockouts.

    “There’s nothing really graceful about the Klitschkos or Valuev,” said trainer Joe Goossen, who worked with 6-8 Lance Whitaker. “They know what they’re doing, though. They hold you off with their left and then try to drop a right-hand bomb on you. They’re so big, they have the range to do that. They get great leverage on that right hand. And I think the guys they fight are vulnerable to their best weapon.

    “Unless you’re a real cutie-pie southpaw who is just impossible to touch against a bigger lumbering guy, I’ll take the bigger lumbering guy every time.”

    The boxing establishment has already begun to deal with the increasing height and weight of its biggest fighters, raising the cruiserweight limit to from 190 to 200 pounds.

    One day, the experts believe, the powers that be will introduce a super heavyweight division if there are enough fighters the size of the Klitschkos. Byrd suggested a heavyweight limit of 225 pounds, meaning all the fighters mentioned here would be super heavyweights.

    “The thing is these guys who are tall and weigh 250 pounds are very, very strong guys,” trainer Freddie Roach said. “I think they’ll have to create another division eventually. They already started to make cruiserweight more of a heavyweight division.

    “I can see moving cruiserweight to 210 pounds so you don’t have guys 50 pounds heavier than another. That’s a lot of weight to give up. These guys really are big.”

    Michael Rosenthal can be reached at
    This content is protected
     
  2. dmille

    dmille We knew, about Tszyu, before you. Full Member

    2,269
    69
    Aug 1, 2004
    That is some straight up bullsh!t. The last thing we need is more weight classes.
     
  3. HomicideHenry

    HomicideHenry Many Talents, No Successes Full Member

    2,090
    84
    Feb 4, 2009
    IMO, its nothing but hype trying to sugar coat the fact that the post-Lewis era sucks, trying to make that McCline and the Klitschko's are superior to guys like Ali and Frazier. Its complete garbage.
     
  4. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    Interesting article.

    I remain divided on the subject of whether bigger truly is better. It is when the skill sets are the same, but a lot of the big guys around today aren't very good. (Klitschko brothers aside.)

    There's bound to be a point where being bigger is actually a disadvantage in the ring. Valuev is huge but he's not very skilled, nor is he a big puncher for his size.
    I can't think of a giant-sized heavyweight - one who stood close to, or at, 7 feet - that was, actually.

    Maybe when we see a 6'6, 260 pound version of Ali I'll be convinced. ;)
     
  5. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,719
    3,559
    Jul 10, 2005
    Non of the little guys today are as talent as Ali or Fraizer, or Louis or Dempsey.

    I mean the reason the Kilts rule right now is because there relly is no one out there that KNOWS how to deal with the gaints.

    I belive if we had a prime Tyson in there today, we see Dempsey Willard all over again today.
     
  6. sweetsci

    sweetsci Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,880
    1,832
    Jan 22, 2008
    I hate the idea of naming the biggest division "Super Heavyweight". To me, the "World Heavyweight Champion" should be the biggest, baddest man on the planet. And yes, there should only be one "World Heavyweight Champion". Super Heavyweight. Don't give the "powers that be" any ideas.

    Besides, I think most of the heavyweights today, excepting the Klitschkos and possibly Valuev, are way too heavy and under-trained. They're slow and they plod around the ring. I've been watching heavies from previous eras, the eighties on back, and I'm seeing guys bounce, dance, and glide. Guys who are active in the ring and who use speed, lots of punches, and precise blows to win. I'll bet that the next great heavyweight is a guy who stands 6'1'' to 6'3", weighs 210 to 215 pounds, and blows away our current heavies with speed (and speed is power) and activity.
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Horrible Article. I disagree with most of it. You have the "Bigger is better" disease. These modern superheavyweights today(outside of Wladimir Klitschko) lack skills, athleticism, stamina, and constantly show up out of shape.

    History shows us the best heavyweights in history are from the 185-215lb range. This is for good reason.
     
  8. kenmore

    kenmore Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,132
    28
    Jan 29, 2008
    I think the point is that it would take an Ali or Frazier to beat the Klitschkos, and guys like Ali and Frazier are rare. Therefore, unless the heavyweight division is suddenly filled with great and near-great guys like Ali, Louis, Frazier, etc., big guys like the Klitschkos may be unbeatable.

    If the Klitschkos turn out to be the first of a new generation of unusually big and very competent heavyweights -- and they probably will be -- the cruiserweight division will have to be moved up to 215 lbs. I would add that another division will have to be created for the 190 lbs. guys.
     
  9. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
    The Klitscko's and Lennex Lewis are good examples of big men, the rest like Lance Whitaker and McCline and Valuev I believe would have gone out pretty much as the same way of Willard and Carnera and Buddy Baer vs Dempsey or Louis....Shannon Bigs was a big boy but nothing I think that would have stood out in any era....Sultan handled him easily
     
  10. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    And where are the 185-215 pound heavies today? Out of business. Well, if you look hard enough you might find one top 15 ranked guy at or around 215 pounds.

    And were they any great 230+-pound heavies around when the 185-215 pound guys were kings? No! They did not exist.

    As the article says, the Willard’s, Baer’s, and Simons of boxing simply lack the skills of the modern big fighters today. If you cannot see that after watching the films, there really is not need for you to read any further.

    Bigger alone does not mean better, but bigger with skills, and speed is better. The article did a fair job of explaining why, but could have expanded upon it a bit. The simple physics is bigger and longer means you have the advantage as an out fighter, and the majority of boxing is out fighting, not in fighting. Bigger also means heavier and stronger in most cases, so the advantage of the clinches, and wearing the other man down in his favor too.

    In sports, the saying goes a great big man beats a great little man...and it is especially true in physical sports, and even more true in combat sports. I would say a merely good huge man would likely beat great little men too…unless the little guy has some serious fight altering punching power, he’s in for a pasting.

    Should there be a super heavyweight division? I would say not right now. There is not enough talent to split the heavyweight division from 200 to 225, and over 225.

    In addition, does the heavyweight division really need more world champions? No again.
     
  11. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    splitting the HW division oes jack **** as the SHW would be like the HWs now and al the little guys would move up to where the money is at and the HW division would be like the cruiserweigth division
     
  12. AnthonyJ74

    AnthonyJ74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,260
    53
    Feb 26, 2007
    I think guys like Riddick Bowe and Lennox Lewis were perfect modern-sized heavyweights; they were big, but they were not so big as to make themselves clumsy and uncoordinated. 6'5" is a damn good height for a heavyweight; and 235-245 pounds is a damn good weight. Once a fighter starts getting too big and too tall, the law of diminshing returns starts to come into play; the point where their physical advantages turn into disadvantages.
     
  13. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    Nicely said.
     
  14. Jaws

    Jaws Active Member Full Member

    652
    7
    Mar 13, 2009
    I mostly disagree with this article.

    I think today's huge fighters use their larger size as a crutch for inferior skills. Valuev is pure garbage. Watching him isn't even like watching boxing...

    I do agree, however, that today's heavyweight champion of the world is playing in the NFL or NBA somewhere. The current crop of heavyweight boxers is beyond sad.
     
  15. RafaelGonzal

    RafaelGonzal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,844
    13
    Mar 7, 2006
    What we dont need is another weight class, so guys can show up even fatter than they already do